Please post the SDF update during O4c as a comment of this post.
Fig.1. showed the screen shot of SDF diff.
I accepted this change.
I accepted the changed channnels on the SDF medm screen after the WFSf3 work(klog34173).
I accepted following difference of SDFs (see related klog#34074)
I accepted the following SDFs.
k1ascbpc model:
K1:BPS-{PIT,YAW}_ITMY_INF_GAIN:
This change is related to the work reported in klog34197, and accepted.
I accepted the following difference of SDFs (see related klog34201)
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34212.
k1calcs
JGW-L2314962
After the calibration update work (klog#34088), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. (Keeping these values is enough when model is restarted, so it can be set as CHANS_NOT_MON on down.snap.) And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).
Following changes are applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
k1sdfmanage model:
K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):
This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34231), this modification was accepted.
K1:AIR-CENTER_*_JO (fig2):
Since these channels are read backs from the precision coolers and updated automatically by the script, they should be NOT_MON channels.
So, we changed them to NOT_MON channels.
Following SDF is accepted.
k1visetmxlscmodel:
K1:VIS-ETMX_TM_MASTER_LPHP_SW_REQUEST:
This change is related to ETMX coil driver swapping (klog34246).
k1calcs
I accepted the following SDFs in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap.
This is caused by calibration measurements.
Following change is applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
k1sdfmanage model:
K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):
This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34263), this modification was accepted.
Note that the value was accepted before taking screen shot, so I took screenshot with already accepted value.
k1calcs
JGW-L2314962
After the calibration update work (klog#34269), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).
I applied following changes to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
These changes are performed during today's commissioning works (klog:34267)
K1ASC1 model
K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.1):
We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.
K1VISIMMT1 model
K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_OLDAMP_{P, Y} (Fig.1):
We changed these offsets, turned off FM8, and turned on FM7 to implement the DC control of IMMT1 pitch and yaw, and this modification was accepted.
K1ASC1 model
K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.2):
We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.
K1VISITMYLSC model
K1:VIS-ITMY_TM_DRIVEALIGN_{P, Y}2L_GAIN (Fig.3):
We changed these values to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.
k1omc
I reverted the related SDFs of today's work in klog34279.
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34288.
CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
SDFMANAGE
K1:PICO-PCAL_EY2_{1,2}_TARGET_POSITION
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34292.
CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX1_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX2_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_RX_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME
I accepted the SDFs in the k1omc model related to the klog34295 work.
k1calcs
JGW-L2314962
After the calibration update work (klog#34310), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).
Before starting recovery work of the timing system trouble (klog 34320), we confirmed safe.snap files of attached models.
I accepted the SDFs in observation.snap by today's initial alignment in klog34332.
I accepted SDF of the following channels.
k1sdfmanage (fig1):
K1:PICO-POP_{1,2,3,4}_*:
These channels are related to the GRX alignment reported in klog34356.
I accepted SDF of the following channels.
k1sdfmanage (fig1):
K1:PICO-POP_{1,2,3,4}_*:
These channels are related to the GRX alignment reported in klog34363.
k1asc1 (fig2):
K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET, K1:ASC-PRC2_P_OFFSET, and K1:ASC-MICH_{P,Y}_OFFSET:
These channels are related to the alignment tweaking reported in klog34363.
k1visitmylsc (fig3):
K1:VIS-ITMY_TM_DRIVEALIGN_{P2L,Y2L}_GAIN:
These channels are also related to the alignment tweaking reported in klog34363.
k1visetmxt (fig4):
K1:VIS-ETMX_IP_ISC2LVDT_L:
This change was done for increasing gains of tidal compensation for ETMX actuators reported in klog34356.
I accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-X calibration reported klog34375.
CALEX
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME
I accepted SDF of the following channels.
k1omc model (fig1):
K1:OMC-QPDV{1,2}_{PIT,YAW}:
These modification is related to the low-pass filter implementation reported in klog34386.
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34391.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
We accepted SDFs related to the weekly cal measurement.
CALCS
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement (klog#34412) in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34425.
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34424.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34454.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34463.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
k1calcs
I accepted the following SDFs in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap.
This is caused by calibration measurements.
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34468
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34466.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
I accepted the following difference of SDFs (see related klog34492)
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
I accepted the following differences of SDFs (see related klog34517, klog34518, and klog34519). SDF #25-27 were reverted because of misoperation.
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog#34530.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34536
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34533.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
I accepted the following differences of SDFs again. Although the screenshot was not recorded, the accepted or reverted channels are indicated by a red box in the attached figure.
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34588.
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34593.
We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement in observation.snap, and safe.snap and down.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34597
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34601.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
We accepted the changes of SDFs in k1omc (fig.1) and k1ommt1 (fig.2) by today's initial alignment. And also, the changes of SDFs in k1omc by the iteration between down.snap and observation.snap were reverted (fig.3).
SDF diff appeared when the IFO relocked. Although Tanaka-kun reverted and accepted the SDFs, the same thing happened again after the unlock and relock process.
So it doesn't seem to be a issue of accept-revert cycle.
I guess it's a problem on the guardian code or a some kind of script which computes these values.
1. changed value after the initial alignment.
RECORD_GOOD_VALUES_OMC (400) in INITIAL_ALIGNMNET guardian, the value was changed, that is as expected.
2. First change was detected after the first observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
3. Second change was detected after the second observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
4. Third change was detected after the third observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
5. Fourth change was detected was during the fourth observation and exactly backed to the value of the 1.
6. Fifth change was detected after the fourth observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.) and exactly backed to the value of the 2.
7. Sixth change was detected during the increase las power(1301)->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.) and exactly backed to the value of the 3.
8. Seventh change was detected during the engage whitening filters(1425)->down->reset asc feedback (Fig.1.) and exactly same value of the 4.
Two mysterious point.
Almost all of the value change detected during the RESET_ASC_FEEDBACK, the value change was very small, but it appeared after the work of the 1. and stopped after the lockedloss of the 8.
One different phenomena is the 5. changed the value during the observation state, that mysterious.
The following SDFs were accepted.
The related work: klog34632
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3,4}_TARGET_POSITION
I and YamaT san accepted ommt1 sdf. (Fig will be uploaded later)
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34635.
CALEX
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX1_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX2_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_RX_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME
SDF before accepting.
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34649.
CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34656.
K1CALEX, K1CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
No update this time: K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_MAIN_{X,Y}
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34665.
K1CALEX, K1CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_MAIN_{X,Y}
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34672
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34671.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34712.
K1CALEX, K1CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
I accepted the following differences of SDFs (see related klog34715, klog34716, klog34717, and klog34718).
I accepted the following differences of SDFs (see related klog34731).
I reverted the following channels.
k1vissrmp (fig1):
K1:VIS-SRM_IM_OPTICALIGN_{P,Y}_OFFSET:
I reverted the values because there is no log and no reason to move SRM at OBSERVATION state.
k1omc (fig2):
K1:OMC-ASC_QPD1_PIT_SET and K1:OMC-ASC_QPD2_YAW_SET:
Since these diffs are due to numerical rounding errors, I reverted the values to avoid numerical rounding errors.
k1visimmt1 (fig3):
K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_SET_{P,Y}_TRAMP:
Since these is no reason to change the TRAMP of IMMT1 TM setpoint, I reverted them.
I accepted the following channels.
k1visommt1 (fig1):
K1:VIS-OMMT1_TM_OPTICALIGN_{P,Y}_OFFSET:
Since these canges due to the initial alignment, they should be accepted.
k1visbsp (fig2):
K1:VIS-BS_TM_OLDAMP_Y:
This modification is related to the work reported in klog34701, I accepted the change.
k1visetmxlsc (fig3):
K1:VIS-ETMX_{MN,IM}_LOCK_L:
Since this modification is related to the work reported in klog34764, I accepted these changes.
k1asc1 (fig4):
K1:ASC-MICH_Y:
Since this change is also related to the work reported in klog34701, I accepted the change.
K1:ASC-PRC1_{P,Y}, K1:ASC-PRC2_Y, K1:ASC-{INMTRX,OUTMTRX}_Y_*:
Since these changes are related to the work reported in klog34750 and klog34739, I accepted the changes.
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34778
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34777.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1-2), down.snap (Fig.3-4), and safe.snap (Fig.5-6).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.7.
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
Because we found some mistakes in calibration as reported in klog#34778, I re-calculated line tracking parameters.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34794.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#34799
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34798.
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
I accepted the following differences of SDFs indicated in the red box (see related klog34911).
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34931.
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog 34946
I accepted the following differences of SDFs indicated in the red box (see related klog 35119, 35120, 35121). Though the attached table shows the SDF status in down.snap, the SDFs were accepted in observation.snap.
I accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-X calibration reported klog35131.
CALEX
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog35137.
CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME
We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog35214.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
SDFMANAGE
K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3}_TARGET_POSITION
Following changes are applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
k1grdconfig model:
K1:CAM-EXA_EXP, K1:CAM-EXA_GAIN, K1:CAM-EYA_EXP, K1:CAM-EYA_GAIN, K1:CAM-IXA_EXP, K1:CAM-IXA_GAIN, K1:CAM-IYA_EXP, K1:CAM-IYA_GAIN (fig1, fig2):
These channels shows the exposure time and gain for taking the TCam image (not movie). Previously these channels are registered as MON channels. But, we would like to take TCam images during the OBSERVING mode without making the SDFs. So, we changed them to NOT_MON channels.
We accepted the following SDF changes caused by klog35360.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
SDFMANAGE
K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3}_TARGET_POSITION
I accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-X calibration reported klog35383.
CALEX
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME
We accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-Y calibration reported klog35391.
CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME
We accepted the following SDF changes caused by klog35446.
CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
(Fig.1.) klog35048
K1:VIS-ETMX_BF_SET_Y_OFFSET
(Fig.2.) Initial alignment 4th Nov. morning (no significant log)
K1:OMC-ASC_QPD1_PIT_SET
K1:OMC-ASC_QPD1_YAW_SET
 K1:OMC-ASC_QPD2_PIT_SET
K1:OMC-ASC_QPD2_YAW_SET
(Fig.3.) klog35232 (revert)
K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_SET_P_TRAMP
We accepted the following SDFs.
k1ASC0 (fig1):
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35208 and klog35408.
So, they should be accepted.
k1ASC1 (fig2):
K1:ASC-{C,D}HARD_{P,Y}:
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35180.
So, they should be accepted.
K1:ASC-{IN,OUT}MTRX_*:
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35408.
So, they should be accepted.
K1:ASC-{MICH,PRC1,PRC2}_{P,Y}:
All changes filter module setting is same as the fig5 in klog35408 (another related log is klog35187).
So, they should be accepted.
K1:*_OFFSET:
There is no clear log about these changes but they are changed to stabilize the ASC.
Anyway, these values should be tuned again for obtain the best sensitivity, so I accepted them at this stage.
k1ALSPLL (fig3):
K1:ALS-{X}_PLL_IN1GAIN, K1:LSC-CARM_SERVO_IN2GAIN:
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35144.
So, they should be accepted.
K1:LSC-CARM_SERVO_FASTGAIN:
This change happens according with the change of the guardian to avoid the CARM instability during INCREASING_LAS_POWER state reported in klog35193.
So, it should be accepted.
k1visommt1 (fig4):
All changes are relate to the initial alignment performed during the IFO recovery.
So, they should be accepted.
k1vis{i,e}tm{x,y}p (fig5-8):
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35208.
So, they should be accepted.
k1visetmxlsc (fig9):
This change is related to the work reported in klog35480.
So, it should be accepted.
k1imc (fig10):
K1:IMC-SERVO_FASTGAIN, K1:IMC-SERVO_FASTPOL:
These changes are related to the work reported in klog35394.
So, they should be accepted.
K1:IMC-SERVO_IN{1,2}GAIN_*:
All changes are related to the wrk reported in klog35489, klog35453, and klog35407.
So, they should be accepted.
K1:IMC-SERVO_NPRO_TEMP_BIAS_OFFSET:
This change is not written in klog but probably related to the work reported in klog34992.
Since current lock is stable, I accepted the current value.
I accepted the following SDFs.
k1sdfmanage (fig1):
All values are relaed to the work reported in klog35358, and klog35340.
So, they should be accepted.
I accepted the following SDFs in Fig. 1, except for K1:PSL-PMC_TEST2_ON and K1:PSL-PMC_REFL_MAX.
- K1:PSL-PMC_TEST2_ON was used for PMC OLTF measurement (klog: 35386), but was forgotten to be tuned off, so I reverted it
- K1:PSL-PMC_REFL_MAX was changed temporarily when we aligned the neoLASE laser to PMC, so I reverted it.
Other changes were basically due to the swapping FB laser to the neoLASE laser, and all were accepted.
- K1: LAS-POW_FIB_GAIN, K1: LAS-POW_FIB_OFFSET, K1:PSL-PMC_REFL_DC_GAIN, K1:PSL-PMC_REFL_RFDC_GAIN, and K1:PSL-PMC_TRANS_DC_GAIN are based on the work of klog: 34599.
- K1:PSL-PMC_TRANS_DC_GAIN does not matter; it is just the sign of value 0.
- K1: PSL-REFCAV_TRANS_OFFSET was not used for a long time, and now it is connected to the monitor PD signal for the interlock for FB laser. temporarily. This work is based on the work of klog: 35369.
K1CALCS
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT,LATEST} which are memo about CAL measurements.
It's related to klog#35499
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Because these two channels are StringIn and numerical rounding errors never occurs, re-load cycle was skipped.
I accepted the following SDFs.
k1asc1 (fig1):
These changes were done for IFO stability check on November 6.
Since TRAMP doesn't affect to the IFO condition, I accepted them.
k1lsc (fig2):
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35505.
Since they should not affect the IFO condition, they are accepted.
k1omc (fig3):
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35510.
Since these changes are for improving the stability of IFO, they should be accepted.
k1visetmxp (fig4):
All changes are related to the work reported in klog35510.
Since they should not affect the IFO condition, they are accepted.
k1ascbpc (fig5):
This change is related to the work reported in klog35504.
Since this change is for keeping beam spot on ETMY at the center, it should be accepted.
I accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog35522.
k1calex
k1caley
We accepted the following SDFs.
k1visommt1 (fig1):
All diffs are related to the initial alignment work, so they should be accepted.
k1omc (fig2):
All diffs are also relted to the initial alignment work, so they should be accepted.
k1visitmxt (fig3):
This change is related to the work reported in klog35544.
So, it should be accepted.
I accepted the following differences of SDFs except for "K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1" (see related klog35564).
I accepted the following SDFs.
k1visitmxt (fig1):
These values are related to the work reported in klog35564.
So, they should be accepted.
k1sdfmanage (fig2):
Though there is no klog yet, I confirmed this change was intentionally performed.
So, I accepted it.
I changed the tartget temp of the SR-C precision cooler from 20 to 21 around 8:00 today.
Following SDF were accepted to back to observing.
K1VISOMMT1 (Fig.1)
K1:VIS-OMMT1_TM_OPTICALIGN_{P,Y}_OFFSET
It's one of numerical rounding issue according to Ushiba-kun. It's found when we moved from CALIB_NOT_READY to READY.
K1CALCS
Channels in JGW-L2314962
It's related to klog#35572
Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.
We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog35575.
