I accepted the changed channnels on the SDF medm screen after the WFSf3 work(klog34173).

I accepted following difference of SDFs (see related klog#34074)

I accepted the following SDFs.

k1ascbpc model:

K1:BPS-{PIT,YAW}_ITMY_INF_GAIN:

This change is related to the work reported in klog34197, and accepted.

I accepted the following difference of SDFs (see related klog34201)

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34212.

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34088), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. (Keeping these values is enough when model is restarted, so it can be set as CHANS_NOT_MON on down.snap.) And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

Following changes are applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.

k1sdfmanage model:

K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):

This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34231), this modification was accepted.

K1:AIR-CENTER_*_JO (fig2):

Since these channels are read backs from the precision coolers and updated automatically by the script, they should be NOT_MON channels.
So, we changed them to NOT_MON channels.

Following SDF is accepted.

k1visetmxlscmodel:

K1:VIS-ETMX_TM_MASTER_LPHP_SW_REQUEST:

This change is related to ETMX coil driver swapping (klog34246).

k1calcs

I accepted the following SDFs in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap.
This is caused by calibration measurements.

Following change is applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.

k1sdfmanage model:

K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):

This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34263), this modification was accepted.
Note that the value was accepted before taking screen shot, so I took screenshot with already accepted value.

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34269), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

I applied following changes to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
These changes are performed during today's commissioning works (klog:34267)

K1ASC1 model

K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.1):

We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

K1VISIMMT1 model

K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_OLDAMP_{P, Y} (Fig.1):

We changed these offsets, turned off FM8, and turned on FM7 to implement the DC control of IMMT1 pitch and yaw, and this modification was accepted.

K1ASC1 model

K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.2):

We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

K1VISITMYLSC model

K1:VIS-ITMY_TM_DRIVEALIGN_{P, Y}2L_GAIN (Fig.3):

We changed these values to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

k1omc

I reverted the related SDFs of today's work in klog34279.

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34288.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}

SDFMANAGE

K1:PICO-PCAL_EY2_{1,2}_TARGET_POSITION

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34292.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX1_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX2_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_RX_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME

I accepted the SDFs in the k1omc model related to the klog34295 work.

We accepted SDFs reported klog34303.

We accepted SDFs reported klog34312.

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34310), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

I accepted the SDFs in observation.snap by today's initial alignment in klog34332.