Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
OBS (SDF)
takafumi.ushiba - 11:14 Thursday 12 June 2025 (34169) Print this report
Changes of observation.snap during O4c

Please post the SDF update during O4c as a comment of this post.

Comments to this report:
takaaki.yokozawa - 11:16 Thursday 12 June 2025 (34170) Print this report
After the trouble shooting work of klog34168, there are one change of SDF as expected.
Fig.1. showed the screen shot of SDF diff.
I accepted this change.
Images attached to this comment
hirose.chiaki - 12:21 Friday 13 June 2025 (34190) Print this report

I accepted the changed channnels on the SDF medm screen after the WFSf3 work(klog34173).

Images attached to this comment
takaaki.yokozawa - 14:15 Friday 13 June 2025 (34202) Print this report
I accepted the SDF change by the PEM work (klog34195)
Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 14:20 Friday 13 June 2025 (34203) Print this report

I accepted following difference of SDFs (see related klog#34074)

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 14:38 Friday 13 June 2025 (34205) Print this report

I accepted the following SDFs.

k1ascbpc model:

K1:BPS-{PIT,YAW}_ITMY_INF_GAIN:

This change is related to the work reported in klog34197, and accepted.

Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 15:06 Friday 13 June 2025 (34209) Print this report

I accepted the following difference of SDFs (see related klog34201)

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 17:01 Friday 13 June 2025 (34219) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34212.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 19:10 Friday 13 June 2025 (34221) Print this report

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34088), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. (Keeping these values is enough when model is restarted, so it can be set as CHANS_NOT_MON on down.snap.) And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 10:40 Monday 16 June 2025 (34234) Print this report

Following changes are applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.

k1sdfmanage model:

K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):

This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34231), this modification was accepted.

K1:AIR-CENTER_*_JO (fig2):

Since these channels are read backs from the precision coolers and updated automatically by the script, they should be NOT_MON channels.
So, we changed them to NOT_MON channels.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 14:09 Monday 16 June 2025 (34247) Print this report

Following SDF is accepted.

k1visetmxlscmodel:

K1:VIS-ETMX_TM_MASTER_LPHP_SW_REQUEST:

This change is related to ETMX coil driver swapping (klog34246).

Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 22:06 Monday 16 June 2025 (34253) Print this report

k1calcs

I accepted the following SDFs in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap.
This is caused by calibration measurements.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 16:23 Tuesday 17 June 2025 (34266) Print this report

Following change is applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.

k1sdfmanage model:

K1:AIR-CENTER_SRX1_S1 (fig1):

This EPICS channel shows the temperature setpoint of the precision cooler near SR3.
Since temperature setpoint was changed by 0.1 degree (klog34263), this modification was accepted.
Note that the value was accepted before taking screen shot, so I took screenshot with already accepted value.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 19:12 Tuesday 17 June 2025 (34271) Print this report

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34269), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

Images attached to this comment
kentaro.komori - 19:44 Tuesday 17 June 2025 (34272) Print this report

I applied following changes to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.
These changes are performed during today's commissioning works (klog:34267)

K1ASC1 model

K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.1):

We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

K1VISIMMT1 model

K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_OLDAMP_{P, Y} (Fig.1):

We changed these offsets, turned off FM8, and turned on FM7 to implement the DC control of IMMT1 pitch and yaw, and this modification was accepted.

K1ASC1 model

K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET (Fig.2):

We changed this offset to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

K1VISITMYLSC model

K1:VIS-ITMY_TM_DRIVEALIGN_{P, Y}2L_GAIN (Fig.3):

We changed these values to reduce the jitter coupling, and this modification was accepted.

Images attached to this comment
kenta.tanaka - 23:22 Wednesday 18 June 2025 (34281) Print this report

k1omc

I reverted the related SDFs of today's work in klog34279.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 12:33 Thursday 19 June 2025 (34289) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34288.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}

SDFMANAGE

K1:PICO-PCAL_EY2_{1,2}_TARGET_POSITION

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 16:05 Thursday 19 June 2025 (34293) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34292.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX1_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX2_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_RX_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME

 

Images attached to this comment
kenta.tanaka - 21:27 Thursday 19 June 2025 (34298) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 12:02 Friday 20 June 2025 (34304) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
takaaki.yokozawa - 12:08 Friday 20 June 2025 (34307) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 17:34 Friday 20 June 2025 (34313) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 20:33 Friday 20 June 2025 (34317) Print this report

k1calcs

JGW-L2314962

After the calibration update work (klog#34310), line tracking parameters were updated. They are accepted in observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3). On down.snap and safe.snap, measurement date record also accepted. And then, numerical residuals on observation.snap were reverted (Fig.4).

Images attached to this comment
shoichi.oshino - 13:52 Saturday 21 June 2025 (34328) Print this report
[Tanaka, Ushiba, Oshino]

Before starting recovery work of the timing system trouble (klog 34320), we confirmed safe.snap files of attached models.
Images attached to this comment
kenta.tanaka - 17:12 Saturday 21 June 2025 (34333) Print this report

I accepted the SDFs in observation.snap by today's initial alignment in klog34332.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 21:48 Tuesday 24 June 2025 (34357) Print this report

I accepted SDF of the following channels.

k1sdfmanage (fig1):

K1:PICO-POP_{1,2,3,4}_*:

These channels are related to the GRX alignment reported in klog34356.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 17:57 Wednesday 25 June 2025 (34366) Print this report

I accepted SDF of the following channels.

k1sdfmanage (fig1):

K1:PICO-POP_{1,2,3,4}_*:

These channels are related to the GRX alignment reported in klog34363.

k1asc1 (fig2):

K1:ASC-INP2_P_OFFSET, K1:ASC-PRC2_P_OFFSET, and K1:ASC-MICH_{P,Y}_OFFSET:

These channels are related to the alignment tweaking reported in klog34363.

k1visitmylsc (fig3):

K1:VIS-ITMY_TM_DRIVEALIGN_{P2L,Y2L}_GAIN:

These channels are also related to the alignment tweaking reported in klog34363.

k1visetmxt (fig4):

K1:VIS-ETMX_IP_ISC2LVDT_L:

This change was done for increasing gains of tidal compensation for ETMX actuators reported in klog34356.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 15:00 Thursday 26 June 2025 (34377) Print this report

I accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-X calibration reported klog34375.

CALEX

K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 11:25 Friday 27 June 2025 (34387) Print this report

I accepted SDF of the following channels.

k1omc model (fig1):

K1:OMC-QPDV{1,2}_{PIT,YAW}:

These modification is related to the low-pass filter implementation reported in klog34386.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 16:31 Friday 27 June 2025 (34392) Print this report

We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34391.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 17:45 Friday 27 June 2025 (34394) Print this report

We accepted SDFs related to the weekly cal measurement.

CALCS

K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}

Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 16:53 Monday 30 June 2025 (34411) Print this report

We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement (klog#34412) in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 15:28 Tuesday 01 July 2025 (34426) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34425.
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34424.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 9:42 Friday 04 July 2025 (34455) Print this report

We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34454.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 16:40 Friday 04 July 2025 (34464) Print this report

We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34463.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 18:25 Friday 04 July 2025 (34467) Print this report

k1calcs

I accepted the following SDFs in observation.snap, down.snap, and safe.snap.
This is caused by calibration measurements.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 19:09 Friday 04 July 2025 (34469) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34468
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34466.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 10:08 Wednesday 09 July 2025 (34493) Print this report

I accepted the following difference of SDFs (see related klog34492)

Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 9:43 Friday 11 July 2025 (34513) Print this report
We accepted the SDFs reported on klog#34512.

CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}
Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 12:18 Friday 11 July 2025 (34515) Print this report
We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement in observation.snap, and safe.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 14:58 Friday 11 July 2025 (34520) Print this report

I accepted the following differences of SDFs (see related klog34517, klog34518, and klog34519). SDF #25-27 were reverted because of misoperation.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 18:17 Friday 11 July 2025 (34531) Print this report

We accepted the SDFs reported on klog#34530.

CALEX, CALEY
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 20:10 Friday 11 July 2025 (34534) Print this report
We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement in observation.snap, and safe.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}
Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 20:27 Friday 11 July 2025 (34532) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34536
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34533.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 13:50 Saturday 12 July 2025 (34537) Print this report

I accepted the following differences of SDFs again. Although the screenshot was not recorded, the accepted or reverted channels are indicated by a red box in the attached figure.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 10:12 Friday 18 July 2025 (34589) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34588.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 15:32 Friday 18 July 2025 (34594) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34593.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 18:59 Friday 18 July 2025 (34598) Print this report

We accepted SDFs related to the cal measurement in observation.snap, and safe.snap and down.snap (k1calcs).
K1:CAL-MEAS_{CURRENT, LATEST}

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 19:14 Friday 18 July 2025 (34599) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34597
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34601.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
kenta.tanaka - 14:54 Tuesday 22 July 2025 (34624) Print this report

We accepted the changes of SDFs in k1omc (fig.1) and k1ommt1 (fig.2) by today's initial alignment. And also, the changes of SDFs in k1omc by the iteration between down.snap and observation.snap were reverted (fig.3).

Images attached to this comment
shinji.miyoki - 7:56 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34627) Print this report

SDF diff appeared when the IFO relocked. Although Tanaka-kun reverted and accepted the SDFs, the same thing happened again after the unlock and relock process.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 9:10 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34628) Print this report
Change in values is quite larger than numerical rounding error.
So it doesn't seem to be a issue of accept-revert cycle.

I guess it's a problem on the guardian code or a some kind of script which computes these values.
takaaki.yokozawa - 9:48 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34629) Print this report
I checked the signal of the K1:VIS-OMMT1_TM_OPTICALIGN_P_OFFSET.

1. changed value after the initial alignment.
RECORD_GOOD_VALUES_OMC (400) in INITIAL_ALIGNMNET guardian, the value was changed, that is as expected.

2. First change was detected after the first observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
3. Second change was detected after the second observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
4. Third change was detected after the third observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.)
5. Fourth change was detected was during the fourth observation and exactly backed to the value of the 1.
6. Fifth change was detected after the fourth observation->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.) and exactly backed to the value of the 2.
7. Sixth change was detected during the increase las power(1301)->down->reset asc feedback(Fig.1.) and exactly backed to the value of the 3.
8. Seventh change was detected during the engage whitening filters(1425)->down->reset asc feedback (Fig.1.) and exactly same value of the 4.

Two mysterious point.
Almost all of the value change detected during the RESET_ASC_FEEDBACK, the value change was very small, but it appeared after the work of the 1. and stopped after the lockedloss of the 8.
One different phenomena is the 5. changed the value during the observation state, that mysterious.
Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 12:45 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34633) Print this report

The following SDFs were accepted.
The related work: klog34632

K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3,4}_TARGET_POSITION

Images attached to this comment
shinji.miyoki - 12:59 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34634) Print this report

I and YamaT san accepted ommt1 sdf. (Fig will be uploaded later)

dan.chen - 15:06 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34636) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34635.

CALEX

K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_T_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX1_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX2_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_RX_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME

Images attached to this comment
shinji.miyoki - 17:13 Wednesday 23 July 2025 (34641) Print this report

SDF before accepting.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 15:38 Thursday 24 July 2025 (34650) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog34649.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 9:22 Friday 25 July 2025 (34657) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34656.

K1CALEX, K1CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}

No update this time: K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_MAIN_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 15:30 Friday 25 July 2025 (34666) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34665.

K1CALEX, K1CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}
K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_MAIN_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 17:52 Friday 25 July 2025 (34670) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34672
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34671.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
Shingo Hido - 9:41 Friday 01 August 2025 (34713) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34712.

K1CALEX, K1CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_PATH{1,2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 11:36 Friday 01 August 2025 (34719) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 9:39 Monday 04 August 2025 (34732) Print this report

I accepted the following differences of SDFs (see related klog34731).

Images attached to this comment
takaaki.yokozawa - 15:30 Tuesday 05 August 2025 (34751) Print this report
I accepted those channels since their value changed every time after the initial alignment.
Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 17:41 Wednesday 06 August 2025 (34769) Print this report

I reverted the following channels.

k1vissrmp (fig1):

K1:VIS-SRM_IM_OPTICALIGN_{P,Y}_OFFSET:

I reverted the values because there is no log and no reason to move SRM at OBSERVATION state.

k1omc (fig2):

K1:OMC-ASC_QPD1_PIT_SET and  K1:OMC-ASC_QPD2_YAW_SET:

Since these diffs are due to numerical rounding errors, I reverted the values to avoid numerical rounding errors.

k1visimmt1 (fig3):

K1:VIS-IMMT1_TM_SET_{P,Y}_TRAMP:

Since these is no reason to change the TRAMP of IMMT1 TM setpoint, I reverted them.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 17:52 Wednesday 06 August 2025 (34770) Print this report

I accepted the following channels.

k1visommt1 (fig1):

K1:VIS-OMMT1_TM_OPTICALIGN_{P,Y}_OFFSET:

Since these canges due to the initial alignment, they should be accepted.

k1visbsp (fig2):

K1:VIS-BS_TM_OLDAMP_Y:

This modification is related to the work reported in klog34701, I accepted the change.

k1visetmxlsc (fig3):

K1:VIS-ETMX_{MN,IM}_LOCK_L:

Since this modification is related to the work reported in klog34764, I accepted these changes.

k1asc1 (fig4):

K1:ASC-MICH_Y:

Since this change is also related to the work reported in klog34701, I accepted the change.

K1:ASC-PRC1_{P,Y}, K1:ASC-PRC2_Y, K1:ASC-{INMTRX,OUTMTRX}_Y_*:

Since these changes are related to the work reported in klog34750 and klog34739, I accepted the changes.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 12:01 Thursday 07 August 2025 (34779) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34778
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34777.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1-2), down.snap (Fig.3-4), and safe.snap (Fig.5-6).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.7.

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 15:45 Thursday 07 August 2025 (34782) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

Because we found some mistakes in calibration as reported in klog#34778, I re-calculated line tracking parameters.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 14:42 Friday 08 August 2025 (34795) Print this report

We accepted the SDFs reported on klog34794.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{MAIN,PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

Images attached to this comment
takahiro.yamamoto - 18:00 Friday 08 August 2025 (34797) Print this report

K1CALCS

Channels in JGW-L2314962

It's related to klog#34799
They were updated based on the latest value of optical gain of DARM and ETMX actuator efficiencies in klog#34798.

Changes were accepted on observation.snap (Fig.1), down.snap (Fig.2), and safe.snap (Fig.3).
Finally, numerical rounding errors were reverted after re-loading observation.snap as shown in Fig.4.

Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 16:14 Monday 25 August 2025 (34915) Print this report

I accepted the following differences of SDFs indicated in the red box (see related klog34911).

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 15:17 Wednesday 27 August 2025 (34932) Print this report

We accepted Pcal beam position related SDF diffs as reported klog34931.

Images attached to this comment
Misato Onishi - 16:10 Thursday 28 August 2025 (34947) Print this report
Images attached to this comment
ryutaro.takahashi - 12:48 Tuesday 23 September 2025 (35122) Print this report

I accepted the following differences of SDFs indicated in the red box (see related klog 35119, 35120, 35121). Though the attached table shows the SDF status in down.snap, the SDFs were accepted in observation.snap.

Images attached to this comment
Misato Onishi - 16:04 Wednesday 24 September 2025 (35132) Print this report

I accepted the following SDF changes which were made by Pcal-X calibration reported klog35131.

CALEX

K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_CURRENT_TIME

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 14:21 Thursday 25 September 2025 (35138) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog35137.

CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_PD_BG_TX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_OE_{T,R}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_{1,2}_RX_V_R_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_{TX1,TX2,RX}_SET
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN
K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_CURRENT_TIME

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 10:11 Friday 03 October 2025 (35215) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF change caused by klog35214.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

SDFMANAGE

K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3}_TARGET_POSITION

Images attached to this comment
hirotaka.yuzurihara - 10:34 Friday 03 October 2025 (35217) Print this report

Following changes are applied to SDFs during OBSERVATION state.

k1grdconfig model:

K1:CAM-EXA_EXP, K1:CAM-EXA_GAIN, K1:CAM-EYA_EXP, K1:CAM-EYA_GAIN, K1:CAM-IXA_EXP, K1:CAM-IXA_GAIN, K1:CAM-IYA_EXP, K1:CAM-IYA_GAIN (fig1, fig2):

These channels shows the exposure time and gain for taking the TCam image (not movie). Previously these channels are registered as MON channels. But, we would like to take TCam images during the OBSERVING mode without making the SDFs. So, we changed them to NOT_MON channels.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 8:20 Friday 17 October 2025 (35361) Print this report

We accepted the following SDF changes caused by klog35360.

CALEX, CALEY

K1:CAL-PCAL_{EX,EY}_TCAM_{PATH1,PATH2}_{X,Y}

SDFMANAGE

K1:PICO-PCAL_EX2_{1,2,3}_TARGET_POSITION

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×