I measured the open-loop gain of the IRM damper servo in both cases where the loop is open and closed. The maximum gain was about 3, the phase margin at the UGF was about 70 deg, and the gain margin at 160mHz was about 2. The second plot shows each transfer function in the closed loop.

[Kimura and Nakagaki]
 On 22 June, M. Takahashi-san reported the #39 ion pump power supply of X-end had stopped again after displaying an error with "Eroor code 20".
(See Photos 1 and 2)
The pressure gauge shows “7.5×10⁻⁶ Pa,” leading us to conclude that the ion pump power supply did not shut down due to a pressure rise caused by a vacuum leak.
 At around 2:30 p.m., we closed the gate valve between the vacuum duct and the vacuum pumping unit to replace the ion pump power supply.
We then replaced it with a spare power supply and high-voltage cable, and restarted the ion pump power supply.
After startup, the pressure inside the T-tube reached “2.7×10⁻⁶ Pa,” so we opened the previously closed gate valve to resume evacuation by the ion pump.
(See Photos 3 and 4)
The pressure after opening the gate valve was “5.5×10⁻⁶ Pa”.
(See Photos 5 and 6)
  

Abstract:

I implemented SRM GAS modal damping.
The modal damping will be engaged automatically when SRM is at LOCK_ACQUISITION state.

Detail:

I made mistakes in the calculation of actuator matrix, so I calculated it again.
The new modal actuator matrix is shown in fig1.

After fixing the actuator matrix, I measured the suspension transfer functions from M1, M2, and M3 actuators to M1, M2, and M3 sensors, respectively.
Figures 2, 3 and 4 show the measured transfer functions, which appear to be well decoupled.

As discussed in klog36787, the best performance can be obtained by engaging only M1 modal damping and IMV damping.
So, I designed M1 damping filters and implemented it at FM1 of K1:VIS-SRM_GASMODAL_DAMP_M1 filter bank.
Figure 5 shows the OLTF of M1 damping loop.

To implement the modal damping control in the guardian, I also designed filters for K1:VIS-SRM_{F0,F1,BF}_DAMP_GAS aiming to achieve a DC control UGF of 10 mHz.
These filters are implemented at FM3 of each filter bank.

Figure 6 shows the spectrum of GAS filters, IMV OSEM, and OpLevs with modal damping (red) and at current LOCK_ACQUISITION state (blue).
The noise at high frequency becomes better, especially in IMV OSEM, while keeping the spectrum at low frequency.
So, I implemented the new controls in the guardian, and SRM GAS modal damping is now automatically engaged when SRM is at LOCK_ACQUISITION state.

[ Kimura , Oshino,  Nakagaki ]

We have installed a system to monitor the open/closed status of the manual gate valve between SR3 and SRM.
The open/closed status is provided via the following PVs:

K1:VAC-GV_SRM_OPEN
K1:VAC-GV_SRM_CLOSE

These have also been added to the "VAC_OVERVIEW" MEDM screen.  Klog#37109

I offloaded the F0, F1, and F2 GAS filters with the FRs.

[Smith, Tanaka, Fujimoto, Saito]

The sub-laser beam was aligned to the main-laser beam, and after blocking the main laser, flashes from the SRY were observed using the OMC REFL PD. The alignment was further optimized using two mirrors to maximize the fringe amplitude, and the positions of the two lenses were also adjusted. However, the resulting fringe amplitude was smaller than that observed previously (klog:37065). In addition, the signal level in the single-pass configuration was equal to the minimum value of the fringe signal. The mode shape observed with the camera also appeared as if the beam was being clipped somewhere in the optical path. Furthermore, when the beam position was checked in front of the iris located before the sub-laser beam entered the SRY, the beam was found to be offset from the center, even when the fringe amplitude had been maximized. Therefore, it is possible that the alignment was not properly optimized.
 

• First, the alignment was performed using two irises, and the main-laser beam was blocked. When the OMC REFL PD was used to monitor flashes from the SRY, flashes were successfully observed. The alignment was then further optimized using two mirrors to increase the fringe amplitude. The positions of the 200 mm and 150 mm focal-length lenses were also adjusted to maximize the fringe amplitude. However, the resulting fringe amplitude was smaller than that obtained previously (klog:37065) (Fig. 1). Next, the SRM was misaligned to observe the single-pass signal. The signal level was found to be equal to the minimum value of the fringe signal. The HWP located after the FI was then rotated to check whether the signal level could be increased, but the signal was already at its maximum value. The SRM was subsequently realigned, and the spatial mode was observed with a camera. The mode shape appeared as though the beam was being clipped somewhere along the optical path. In addition, after optimizing the alignment to maximize the fringe amplitude, the beam position was checked in front of the iris located before the sub-laser beam entered the SRY. The beam was found to be displaced from the center of the iris. Therefore, it is possible that the alignment was not properly optimized.

Similar work with klog36755, klog36780, klog36781, and so on.

I constructed the sensor and actuator matrices for GAS modal damping of SRM.
Figure 1 and 2 show the sensr and actuator matrices, respectively.
I will test them soon.

Details are summerized in klog #36941.

> When I tried to lock the SRY with initial alignment guardian (actually vertex gurardian), sometimes locked with other state as shown in Fig.1. (around -1m20s and -50s)

This is not a bug of the guardian, but it happens randomly, because the error signal crosses the zero at both the dark (anti-resonant) and the bright (resonant) points. There is nothing we should do, the guardian recognizes which state SRM is and if not on resonance, it tries to lock SRM again. Just wait for a while until SRM is locked on the resonance.

I tested the IRM damper. Fig.1 shows the calculated open-loop gain using the transfer function modeled from the measurement. In the OLDAMP_OFF mode, the fluctuation was not large enough to confirm the damper effect (Fig.2). I excited the TM yaw motion using the IP yaw actuator. The excited lowest mode (60mHz) was reduced by the IRM damper, but the higher mode (160mHz) was excited (Fig.3).

Yokozawa-san,

>When I tried to lock the SRY with initial alignment guardian (actually vertex gurardian), sometimes locked with other state as shown in Fig.1. (around -1m20s and -50s)

Did you mean that there were some bugs in the guardian, or that it was something else?

[Ushiba, Tanaka, Hirose, Fujimoto, Saito]

In the PLL optical path, the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9), where the main-laser and sub-laser beams are combined, was moved to match the waist positions of the two beams. As a result, the mode-matching ratio improved to approximately 85%. After aligning the PLL optical path, a beat signal was successfully observed. In the optical path that injects the sub-laser into the interferometer, a beam profiler was placed at the expected beam-waist location, and the lens positions were adjusted so that the waist occurred at that location. When the beam profile was examined from upstream toward the waist, the beam initially had a reasonably clean shape, but gradually became distorted into a vortex-like pattern. Around the waist position, however, the beam profile became clean again. Although the cause of this behavior remains unclear, the beam shape at the point where it enters the interferometer was clean, so we decided to proceed with alignment. After alignment, we attempted to observe flashes from the SRC, but none were detected. This was likely because the main laser was not properly aligned to the SRC. In the next experiment, we plan to realign the system and attempt to observe the flashes again.
 

• First, the beam profile of the main laser in the PLL optical path was measured and fitted (Fig. 1). The waist positions and waist radii obtained from the fitting are listed below. The coordinate origin is defined at the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9), where the main-laser and sub-laser beams are combined.

  Main laser

  x direction: Waist position = −175.8 ± 2.6 mm, Waist radius = 0.0520 ± 0.0006 mm
  y direction: Waist position = −149.4 ± 2.2 mm, Waist radius = 0.0567 ± 0.0006 mm
  → Average: Waist position = −163 mm, Waist radius = 0.0544 mm

  Comparing these results with the sub-laser waist position measured previously (klog:37086), the waist positions differed by approximately 74 mm. Therefore, the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9) where the main-laser and sub-laser beams are combined was moved approximately 1.5 holes to the right (Fig. 2). The beam profile of the sub-laser was then measured and fitted (Fig. 3). The resulting waist positions and waist radii are listed below. The coordinate origin is defined at the new position of the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9).

  Sub-laser

  x direction: Waist position = −202.2 ± 2.9 mm, Waist radius = 0.0838 ± 0.0010 mm
  y direction: Waist position = −202.3 ± 2.4 mm, Waist radius = 0.0793 ± 0.0008 mm
  → Average: Waist position = −202 mm, Waist radius = 0.082 mm

  To compare the waist positions of the main and sub-laser beams, the main-laser waist position was shifted by the same amount that the beam sampler was moved (approximately 1.5 holes to the right), yielding an adjusted waist position of −200.5 mm. Based on these results, the mode-matching ratio was calculated to be approximately 85%. Next, two irises were installed, and the alignments of the main and sub-laser beams were adjusted so that both beams passed through them. The RFPD position was then adjusted while only the sub-laser beam was incident on the RFPD, and the mirror immediately before the RFPD was used to maximize the DC signal. When the main-laser beam was also directed onto the RFPD, a beat signal was observed. The alignment of the main laser was then optimized to maximize the beat-signal amplitude.
   

• Next, in the optical path that injects the sub-laser into the interferometer, a beam profiler was placed at the expected waist location, and the lens positions were adjusted so that the beam waist occurred there. However, the beam profile appeared distorted (Fig. 4). We first considered the possibility that the beam was being clipped somewhere in the optical path. However, no significant power loss was observed between the FI output and the beam waist. All mirrors and lenses downstream of the FI were inspected and adjusted to ensure that no clipping was occurring, but the beam profile remained distorted. The optical surfaces of the mirrors and lenses were also checked and cleaned, but no improvement was observed. Furthermore, the beam profiler was positioned near the waist, and the mirror angles were adjusted while observing the beam profile. The distorted beam shape persisted and merely shifted laterally, suggesting that the distortion was not caused by clipping. When the beam profile was observed while moving from upstream toward the waist, the beam initially appeared reasonably clean, then gradually developed a vortex-like distortion, and finally became clean again around the waist position. Although the cause of this behavior remains unknown, the beam shape at the point where it enters the interferometer was clean, so we decided to proceed with alignment. Regarding mode matching, since the beam waist was adjusted to occur at the intended waist location, the mode matching is expected to be reasonably good. The beam-waist radii were approximately 0.076 mm in the x direction and 0.074 mm in the y direction, corresponding to an average waist radius of approximately 0.075 mm. If the waist positions are matched, the mode-matching ratio is expected to be approximately 90%. Finally, alignment was performed using the two irises, and the main-laser beam was blocked so that only the sub-laser remained in the SRC. We then attempted to observe SRC flashes, but none were detected. However, because the main laser was not aligned to the SRC, the alignment of the sub-laser, which had been adjusted to match the main laser, was likely also incorrect. This is considered the most probable reason why no flashes were observed. In the next experiment, we plan to realign the system and continue searching for SRC flashes.

[Takahashi, Ushiba]

We measured the transfer function from the H2+H3 actuator for the IRM damper to the Oplev yaw "IRM_OLDAMP_Y" in OLDAMP_OFF mode with "TM_OLDAMP_P&Y" on.  The fundamental mode at 59mHz  was visible, and the higher modes were damped by IM and TM servos.