The removed server was moved to SK server room.
This is a same work as klog#36572 for ITMX.
V1 IO chassis (S1807864) in IYV1 rack was replaced as V2 one (S2416129).
ADC/DAC noise check still remains, but replacing IO chassis itself was finished.
-----
As the same procedure in ITMX case, V2 IO chassis was launched at outside of IYV1 rack without connecting any circuit. This was a connection test of a new MTP fiber cable between the mine server room and the IYV room. At that time, the front-end was newly installed at U27-28 of C2 rack (but still named as K1IZ1) and K1IY1 at U18-19 of ICV rack was alive with the old configuration. Thanks to the fiber cabling and labeling work yesterday, it can be done smoothly and there was no issue on the connection test.
After the connection test, we stopped both K1IZ1 in C2 rack and K1IY1 in ICV rack, removed V1 IO chassis from U6-9 of IYV1 rack, installed V2 IO chassis to there, and plugged all cables to V2 IO chassis. (In the ITMX case, we connected V2 IO chassis at outside of the rack with circuits at first, but we concluded this procedure can be skipped in the yesterday's experience.) And then, V2 IO chassis was launched with the new K1IY1 in C2 rack which was renamed from K1IZ1. ITMY models were able to be launched without any timing and PCIe activation errors.
We haven't yet measured ADC/DAC noise with new hardware configuration. So replacement work isn't fully completed. On the other hand, noisy channel issue will be mitigated by replacing ADC/DAC board not IO chassis, so we can say replacing IO chassis itself was finished. We plan to measure the ADC/DAC noise in the new configuration on next Tuesday.
V1 IO chassis and the old K1IY1 front-end are still left in IYV room and ICV rack, respectively. After seeing weekend situation, we will return them back to Mozumi for the next replacement work.
I finished the replacement of the Pastavi server at Kashiwa (in computer room of daini sougou tou). Now the new server is working well for the Pastavi.
From the user side, the usage is same as previous. The way to access the server is written in the document.
I tested most of the options in several modes including the noise budget mode. As I checked, the options is available on the new environment.
If you faced any issue, please share the information with me.
The remained task is to develop the new scheme to handle several job by using HTCondor.
Date: 2026/03/19
Member: Dan Chen, Shingo Hido, Misato Onishi
We performed our usual WSK calibration at UToyama.
The results look no problem.
Results
| Case | Alpha (Main Value) | Alpha (Uncertainty) |
| Front WSK, Back GSK | -0.910663 | 0.000331 |
| Front GSK, Back WSK | -0.911063 | 0.000076 |
Comparison with Previous Results
Comparing with previous results, no significant issues were found.
Attached graph is the result summary including the latest measured data.
Finally, V2 IO chassis S2416127 was installed at U6-9 of IXV1 rack after removing V1 IO chassis S1807864.
ITMX is currently operated using a fully installed V2 IO chassis and new MTP optical fiber cabling.
This marks the first successful instance of a DGS hardware upgrade toward O5.
-----
IO chassis for ITMX was replaced from V1 to V2 in klog#36572. But V2 IO chassis was still put at the outside of IXV1 rack because V1 IO chassis was still left in IXV1 rack for easy and quick recovery to the old configuration. After then, we confirmed that ITMX can stay in LOCK_ACQUISITION stably with V2 IO chassis. So we removed the V1 IO chassis from the IXV1 rack and installed V2 IO chassis there, today. With this work completed, ITMX is now operated with V2 IO chassis and a new MTP fiber cable which are fully installed. ITMX now achieved final configuration for O5 and this is the first success of upgrading DGS hardware.
To reduce downtime by DGS upgrade after O5, it is important to do same upgrades on as many other racks as possible before O5. Currently, we plan to do it for ITMY during SRM replacement and for ETMX/ETMY after IR1. ~40 working days will be required only for a same work about remaining 20 front-ends (because of limitation on equipments, working space and conflict each other, parallel upgrades for multiple front-end is probably difficult). According to an experience in this time, fortunately, we can probably do same upgrade works in ~ 2 days per front-end with restoring a front-end operation every day during those 2 days. So, it might be a good idea to consider using the two-week period (two maintenance days) for same upgrade works on remaining front-ends also after the SRM replacement work.
By the way, V1 IO chassis was still left in IXV room and old IX1 front-end was also still in ICV rack (RFM board was stolen today for the next upgrade of ITMY). These equipments can return back to the mine or SK server room anytime though I'm not sure sufficient space in both server rooms.
[Kimura and M. Takahasi]
On March 18, we switched form TMP to the Ion pump of the #36 vacuum pump unit at the Y-end .
After the activation of the #36 Ion pump, we turned off the #36 TMP and dry pump
[Kimura and M. Takahashi]
On March 18, we completed maintenance work on the duct-shield cryo-coolers for the EYC.
We are planning to restart the duct-shield cryo-coolers starting March 23, which will also serve as a test run.
[Kimura and M. Takahashi]
As part of maintenance work on the cryogenic cooling units, we removed two valve units from the radiation shield cryo-coolers (P-53 and P-55) of EYC.
The removed valve units were packaged and returned to the manufacturing plant, where they will be disassembled and inspected.
We plan to remove the remaining valve units from the IXC, IYC, and EXC radiation shield cryo-coolers early next week.
KAGRA Pcal-X updates (2026/03/18)
Workers: Kohei Mitsuhashi, Dan Chen
We performed monthly Pcal-X calibration on 2026/03/18.
After the calibration, we updated EPICS parameters related to the Pcal-X system. No issues were found.
| EPICS Key | Before | After | Δ (After − Before) |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_R_SET | 0.98489 | 0.98417 | -0.00072 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_OE_T_SET | 0.98489 | 0.98417 | -0.00072 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET | -0.00381 | -0.00386 | -0.00005 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET | 0.00689 | 0.00602 | -0.00087 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_RX_V_R_SET | 0.50206 | 0.50202 | -0.00004 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_INJ_V_GAIN | 0.95148 | 0.95101 | -0.00047 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_R_SET | 0.97457 | 0.97404 | -0.00053 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_OE_T_SET | 0.97457 | 0.97404 | -0.00053 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET | 0.00551 | 0.00519 | -0.00032 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_2_RX_V_R_SET | 0.49794 | 0.49798 | 0.00004 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_RX_SET | 1.48800 | 1.48915 | 0.00115 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX1_SET | 0.52710 | 0.52744 | 0.00035 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_WSK_PER_TX2_SET | 0.38759 | 0.38799 | 0.00040 |
I offloaded the F0 and F1 GAS filters with the FRs.
Attached spectrum was around 16th 00:00:00(JST)
Compared from the klog36509,
- The trend of the XY and Z was different.
- Large peaks detected at 6 Hz in XY direction
- Above 10 Hz, the ground motion was larger than the KAGRA hokubu-kaikan 2F
- Due to the vibration from keisanki room at 1st floor?
Next , check the spectrum with traffic situation (track and so on)
[Kimura and Yasui]
Parts replaced during maintenance work
1. Absorber in the helium compressor
2. Filter unit at the supply side
3. Gas replacement inside the cold head in accordance with SHI work procedures
4. Disassembly and maintenance of the valve unit at the SHI factory
5. Gas replacement in the compressor and flexible tubing
(1) Helium gas used: G-1 grade
(2) Filling pressure: 14.8 bar
Similar shape in POW PMC OUT and IP QPD P,Y
large signal in IMMT1 trans if POW PMC OUT became large
Several different in IMC refl QPD 1 and 2
Distance dependence of the response of IP1, 2
1 inch : basically around 500 Hz had resonant frequency
2 inch : basically around 330 and 470 Hz have peaks
150 Hz(M18-1) and 210 Hz (M17) is special resonant frequency
Before the PMC
Relatively small signal in the IMC refl sensors
large peak at POW PMC OUT
340(M04’), 360(M3’) and 680(M04’) Hz may come from the 2 inch mirror before the PMC
After the PMC
M5 1 inch : some 520 Hz signal in IMC refl sensors, several peak in IP pitch signal
M6 1 inch : Quite large peak in 470 Hz in IMC refl sensors, IP peak except for QPD1 yaw ,Small peak in IMMT1 trans
M7 2 inch : some peak in 470 Hz in IMC refl, IP, ACC1, small peak in IMMT1 trans P>Y
M8 1 inch : Peak at 520 Hz in IMC refl and IP, DC QDP2 pitch largest
M9 1 inch : Peak in 510 Hz in various IMC refl (QPD1 larger), and IP (QPD1 larger), 2nd peak 560 Hz in several sensors
M10 1 inch : 490 Hz peaks in several sensors
M18-1 2 inch: large peak at 150 Hz, several peak in 295 and 440 Hz, 640 Hz
M12 2 inch : peak at 330 Hz, 485 Hz(shape different), 550 Hz
M13 1 inch : peak at 550 Hz
M14 1 inch : peak at 510 Hz
M17 2 inch : peak at 210 Hz, 337, 420, 640, 710 Hz
M18-2 2 inch : 337, 350, 550, 680 Hz
M19 2 inch : 365, 395 Hz
M20 2 inch : peaks in 320, 350 and 630 Hz
periscope upper : 450 Hz
periscope lower : 450 Hz
A CAL Tcam session was performed to obtain beam position information necessary for Pcal. The parameters have already been updated, and SDF has been accepted.
Operator: Shingo Hido, Kohei Mitsuhashi, Dan Chen
Update Time: 2026/03/18 07:41:38
| EPICS Key | Before [mm] | After [mm] | Δ (After - Before) [mm] |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH1_X | 0.07325 mm | -0.87474 mm | -0.94799 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH1_Y | 66.15693 mm | 66.37439 mm | +0.21746 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH2_X | 0.56752 mm | -0.37755 mm | -0.94507 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_TCAM_PATH2_Y | -68.50339 mm | -67.02710 mm | +1.47629 mm |
This work is continued from klog36589
## GAS control modification
According to yesterday's results related to GAS, there seem to be gain peaking at 3-4 Hz. So I reduced {F0,F1,BF} gains to -6dB. After that I measured their OLTFs when SR2 is in the LOCK_ACQUISITION state. Fig.1,2,3 show the results. Unfortunately, OLTF could not be measured well maybe due to the coupling between GAS controls. Acoording to loop suppression (IN2/EXC), their controls seem to work well and the peaking around 3-4Hz becomes smaller. Fig.4 shows the error/feedback spectra. The peaking seems to be disappeared although each residual GAS motion seems to be not changed so much.
## IM DAMP roll off modification
I also modified the roll off filters for IM DAMP {L, P, R, Y}. As for T and V, elliptic filter was also not used in SR3. So I did not touch them in this time. (Maybe it is better to change)
I measured the OLTFs after the modification. Figure.5, 6, 7, and 8 show the OLTFs of IM DAMP {L,P,R,Y}. Also Fig. 9 and 10 show the error/feedback spectra. the feedback above 10 Hz was rolled off successfully.
The data transfer for the output of low-latency calibration pipeline was also resumed.
Now, it is nothing more than just a PD dark noise with applying DARM sensing response but the latest LL frame are also available at Kashiwa.
Now, all switches can be reachable from k1cam*.
-----
I couldn't find the camera switch at EY at first. This was because a same IP address was used on the switches at EY and OMC and OMC switch responded earlier than EY one when I accessed that IP address. That IP address was different segment from the camera network and switches couldn't be accessed from k1cam*, so I changed their IP addresses as one in the camera network segment. Latest information can be found in the JGW wiki.
And also, I added camera names on the port description of the switch management interface. This information helps us to do the emergency recovery of each cameras by disabling/enabling PoE power supply on the switch management interface. When a new camera will be added, please update the port description of each switches for an easy network management.
[Kimura and Yasui]
At around 10:00 a.m. on March 17, we stopped the vacuum pumping in the Q-mass piping, opened the cryostat-side GV, and connected the Q-mass.
The pressure inside the piping before opening the cryostat-side GV was 1.8×10⁻⁴ Pa, and after opening the GV, it was 4.4×10⁻⁵ Pa.
We then installed an analysis unit on the Q-mass piping. The final pressure inside the piping was 3.5 × 10⁻⁵ Pa.
We then removed the vacuum pumping unit from the piping.
[Kimura and Yasui]
On March 17, we completed maintenance work on the duct-shield cryo-coolers for IXC and IYC.
Maintenance work on the duct-shield cryo-coolers for EXC and EYC is also scheduled to be completed by the end of this week.
We are planning to restart the duct-shield cryo-coolers starting March 23, which will also serve as a test run.
[Kimura and Yasui]
Parts replaced during maintenance work
1. Absorber in the helium compressor
2. Filter unit at the supply side
3. Gas replacement inside the cold head in accordance with SHI work procedures
4. Disassembly and maintenance of the valve unit at the SHI factory
5. Gas replacement in the compressor and flexible tubing
(1) Helium gas used: G-1 grade
(2) Filling pressure: 14.8 bar
[Kimura and M. Takahashi]
On March 18, we completed maintenance work on the duct-shield cryo-coolers for the EYC.
We are planning to restart the duct-shield cryo-coolers starting March 23, which will also serve as a test run.
Workers: Kohei Mitsuhashi, Dan Chen
We performed monthly Pcal-Y calibration on 2026/03/17.
After the calibration, we updated EPICS parameters related to the Pcal-Y system. No issues were found.
| EPICS Key | Before | After | Δ (After − Before) |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_R_SET | 0.98973 | 0.98977 | 0.00004 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_OE_T_SET | 0.98973 | 0.98977 | 0.00004 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_RX_V_SET | -0.00484 | -0.00492 | -0.00008 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_PD_BG_TX_V_SET | 0.02704 | 0.01218 | -0.01486 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_1_RX_V_R_SET | 0.50319 | 0.50276 | -0.00044 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_INJ_V_GAIN | 0.51512 | 0.51836 | 0.00324 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_R_SET | 0.98618 | 0.98609 | -0.00009 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_OE_T_SET | 0.98618 | 0.98609 | -0.00009 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_PD_BG_TX_V_SET | 0.02955 | 0.01466 | -0.01489 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_2_RX_V_R_SET | 0.49681 | 0.49724 | 0.00044 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_RX_SET | 1.84214 | 1.84228 | 0.00015 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX1_SET | 0.33376 | 0.33354 | -0.00023 |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_WSK_PER_TX2_SET | 0.90500 | 0.90266 | -0.00234 |
A CAL Tcam session was performed to obtain beam position information necessary for Pcal. The parameters have already been updated, and SDF has been accepted.
Operator: Kohei Mitsuhashi, Dan Chen
Update Time: 2026/03/17 15:31:24
| EPICS Key | Before [mm] | After [mm] | Δ (After - Before) [mm] |
|---|---|---|---|
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH1_X | 1.33223 mm | 0.76950 mm | -0.56273 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH1_Y | 65.85923 mm | 65.80570 mm | -0.05353 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH2_X | -0.29757 mm | 1.39102 mm | +1.68859 mm |
| K1:CAL-PCAL_EY_TCAM_PATH2_Y | -69.75503 mm | -69.21742 mm | +0.53761 mm |
The reason was VLAN setting of DMG's network switch in KAGRA (SR-S352TR1) was lost.
So we set as that connection port #1 and #2 of cal-gst1,2 to same VLAN of DMG network "vlan untag 30" as below list, respectively.
Now the network connection is resumed.
Below is a part of setting table of SR-S352TR1 now.
ether 1 vlan untag 30
ether 1 description cal-gst1
ether 2 vlan untag 30
ether 2 description cal-gst2
...
ether 38 description hyades-0_irmc
ether 39 vlan untag 31
ether 39 description hyades-1_irmc
ether 40 vlan untag 31
ether 40 description kamups01
ether 49 vlan tag 30-31
ether 49 description kaml2sw02
ether 50 vlan untag 30
ether 50 description hyades-0
ether 51 vlan untag 30
ether 51 description hyades-1
ether 52 vlan untag 30
ether 52 description hyades-2
We also change the password of SR-S352TR1.
I offloaded the F2 and BF GAS filters with the FRs.
[Washimi, Takahashi]
We replaced the broken signal generator (SG) NF1956 with the embedded SG card for the LVDT driver (S1807787) in TMSX. We opened the driver chassis and inserted the SG card. The output of the SG card was connected to "REF IN" port on the front panel. The signal was set to 10kHz in frequency and 7Vp-p in amplitude.
