Hirata, TakahashiR, Kohara (ATC), Tsuzuki (ATC), Yasugaki (ATC), Ebizuka (Riken), Suzuki (TMT), Akutsu, Aso
We measured the surface figure of the 85% 2-inch SRM with different shim thicknesses to find the suitable mounting configuration.
Conclusion
Consistent with Hirose-san’s report, we concluded that using a 1.4 mm thick shim is appropriate.
Note: We were initially concerned that a 1.4 mm shim might provide insufficient pressure to hold the mirror. However, even when the mount was rotated to various orientations, no displacement of the mirror was observed. In addition, the O-ring adheres to the glass surface and helps maintain the mirror position without requiring strong compression. In practice, when we pulled the ⑤ part out of the mirror mount assembly, the O-ring and the mirror came out attached as a single unit.
Measurement Setup
We used a Zygo GPI-XP interferometer with the following configuration.
A λ/10 reference flat was installed in the interferometer. The SRM under test was mounted in a holder, which was supported by two posts and attached to an adjustment stage combining an XYZ stage and a goniometer.
The temperature of the room was 22.8C, which is similar to the temperature in the KAGRA tunnel.
Results
Shim thickness = 1.4mm
We assembled the SRM holder with 1.4mm thick shims first. This is the recommended thickness in Hirose-san's report.
(We used a combination of two 0.5mm shims and four 0.1mm shims)
The surface figure is beautifully spherical as shown below on the left.
The right hand figure shows the surface figure with the power term removed.
The fitted power term is 571.511nm which translates into the RoC of 462.8m. (Note that the RoC specification of SRM is 458m+/-20m)
The residual RMS after the subtraction of the Zernike terms up to power is 10.728nm. (Note that in Hirose-san's report, this value was 13.3nm for 1.4mm shims).
Shim thickness = 1.3mm
We then removed 0.1mm shims to make the total thickness 1.3mm.
The measured results show clear astigmatism.
The RoC from the power term is 450m. The residual RMS is 103.4nm. While the RoC is still within the tolerance of the specification, the residual RMS is 10 times larger than the 1.4mm case.
This is very similar to the 1.3mm result in Hirose-san's report.
Left: only piston and tilt removed, Right: power is also removed

Shim thickness = 1.4mm again
We then put the 0.1mm shims back to measure the 1.4mm case again to check the repeatability.
The result is fairly consistent with the previous 1.4mm measurement.
RoC = 458.0m, residual RMS = 13.2nm
Left: only piston and tilt removed, Right: power is also removed

Closing Remarks
The obtained results are remarkably consistent with Hirose-san's results.
Also it is quite repeatable.
Note that we have two sets of the SRM mirror mount assembly. What we used this time is a different one from the one Hirose-san used. Still the results are quite similar to each other.
There must be a good mechanical reason for this behavior.





