Reports of 33763
VIS (General)
takafumi.ushiba - 23:33 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36391) Print this report
Comment to TF measurements for Type-A noise budget (36363)

I ran the automeasurement script on the remote desktop session of k1ctr5 to finish the TF measurement for Type-A suspensions.
If someone would like to stop the script, please send the command Ctrl+C on the terminal opened on the remote session of k1ctr5.

Note:

Since excitation flag remains on some models, alignment recoader guardian stops to recoad the IFO alignment.
So I deleted the excitation flag to activate alignment recoader guardian.
Since the current LSC_LOCK guardian needs to update the good oplev values by alignment recoader guardian during lock acquisition, IFO cannot be locked if the excitation flag remains.
So, if  the guardian stops at ALIGNING OMC state for a long time, it would be better to check the excitation flag of all models.

DGS (General)
takahiro.yamamoto - 22:12 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36390) Print this report
Compatibility check of a2A5328-4gmPRO camera and pylon-camera-server
Today, Yokozawa-san connected Basler a2A5328-4gmPRO which is a candidate of the new TCam to the camera network for the first test.
So I tried to connect it via pylon-camera-server, but I couldn't receive any images from camera-server.
Finally, I concluded there was no compatibility between them.
So we need to prepare a compatible camera-server software with Basler a2A5328-4gmPRO by ourselves if it will be really used.
From the view point of effort for software development, it might be better to reconsider the camera model selection.

-----
KAGRA's GigE system consists from Basler acA640-120gm and it's based on SDK/GenlCam v1.x. And also, pylon-camera-server supports only cameras based on v1.x. On the other hand, Basler a2A5328-4gmPRO is based on SDK/GenlCam v2.x. The camera properties and the definition of members in the camera class are different between v1.x and v2.x. So pylon-camera-server cannot access camera properties at the beginning of the server launching though it can access the camera device itself.

To launch camera-server, developing a new camera server software or writing wrapper classes to absorb version discrepancy for all required methods and attributes of all different classes are required. If a2A5328-4gmPRO or another v2.x cameras are only solution which satisfies the specification requirement, we will need to make the decision to allocate time to this software development/maintenance. Personally, I think it would be better to reconsider the model selection if there is another solution in v1.x camera series. More detailed consideration can be found in https://gwwiki.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/JGWwiki/KAGRA/Subgroups/DGS/Projects/Cam/BaslerV2Camera.
MIF (Noise Budget)
takafumi.ushiba - 18:09 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36389) Print this report
Local control noise coupling is reduced after warming up

Abstract:

Current low frequency noise sensitivity, which is better than before warming up, seems due to the coupling reduction from feedback signals to DARM.
At this moment, I have no idea why the coupling is reduced.

Detail:

Currently, low frequency sensitivity (10 - 30 Hz) is slightly (but significantly) better than before warming up.
So, I investigated what happens by comparing the TF measurement results reported in klog35621 and klog36363.

Figure 1 shows the result of the transfer function measurement from ETMX_MN_DAMP_L_OUT to DARM at room (red) and cryogenic (blue) temperature.
The TF gain seems significantly smaller at room temperature.
Since actuator efficiency change should be much small according to the change of OLTF of local control loops after warming up, I have no idea why the coupling from feedback signals to DARM is reduced so much.

Images attached to this report
IOO (General)
Carl Blair - 17:10 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36388) Print this report
No jitter noise measurement this afternoon

[Alex, Carl]

We were unable to make jitter noise measurementthis afternoon.  We waited for the OMC to lock many times.  We found we could force it to lock by noting the HV1_OFFSET of the carrier resonance.  Then pausing the OMC_LSC guardian for a minute at a value several hundred counts before the resonance.  Then putting the guardian back in to EXEC.  The one time we made it through we lost lock in the LSC_LOCK ENGAGE_WHITENING_FILTERS state.

MIF (General)
tatsuki.washimi - 12:17 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36385) Print this report
Comment to PEM injection test 260205 (36290)

I converted the Ground (or Foot) vibration to the OMC in-vac table  vibration, by applying the transfer function measured in klog31391 

Images attached to this comment
MIF (General)
tatsuki.washimi - 12:11 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36383) Print this report
Comment to PEM injection test 260205 (36290)

I plotted the Spectrograms and ASDs for the "1. Large vibration injection" tests.

 

Ground Vibration ASDs:

  • Blacks: Median ASDs for the reference time (No injection)
  • Reds: the Max valuses along the time during this test
    • So each points are "the peak height of a single line injection, individually", not a simultaneous broadband injection spectrum
  • Dark color lies: Seismometer (Z) below the OMC chamber
  • Light color lies: Accelerometer (Z) on an OMC-bellows-leg foot (transformed to velocity, by dividing  by 2πf) 

 

Somehow, the SEIS and ACC responses were not consistent. The ease of shaken would be different between the ground and the leg

Images attached to this comment
PEM (Center)
Alexandra Adam - 11:31 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36384) Print this report
Comment to Jitter Coupling Investigations (36369)

[Alex, Carl]

We analysed the data from the white noise injection. White noise was injected into PZT2 with bandpass filter from 200 Hz to 250 Hz and a gain of 0.6. We found that IMC-REFL_QPDA2_PIT_OUT_DQ had the highest coherence. Using the method described in Environmental Noise in Advanced LIGO Detectors we calculated the coupling function for the IMC-REFL to DARM. Where possible the coupling function is given however when the injected noise was not large enough in DARM or in the IMC-REFL the coupling is labelled with a upper or lower limit. Where neither was high enough no coupling factor was displayed. The thresholds used were a factor of 2 for the ratio the DARM ASD of the background to the injection and a factor of 2.5 for the witness sensor.

The coupling from 200-250 Hz appears to be flat with a coupling function of ~9. A comparison with this estimate is attached

 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
PEM (Center)
takaaki.yokozawa - 8:54 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36382) Print this report
PEM injection test 260218
I performed the PEM injection test around IFI area

05:00:00 - 05:28:00 silent run

05:28:00 - 05:38:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Shaker 5, sweep 900 - 1 Hz, 600 s, 40 cnt

05:38:00 - 05:48:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Shaker 6, sweep 900 - 1 Hz, 600 s, 40 cnt

05:48:00 - 05:58:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
Shaker 7, sweep 900 - 1 Hz, 600 s, 40 cnt

05:58:00 - 06:08:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_4_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB8_OUT_DQ
Shaker 8, sweep 900 - 1 Hz, 600 s, 40 cnt

06:10:00 - 06:15:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Shaker 5, white 40 - 120 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:16:00 - 06:21:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Shaker 5, white 80 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:21:00 - 06:26:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Shaker 5, white 180 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:26:00 - 06:31:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Shaker 5, white 280 - 420 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:31:00 - 06:36:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Shaker 6, white 40 - 120 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:36:00 - 06:41:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Shaker 6, white 80 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:41:00 - 06:46:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Shaker 6, white 180 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:46:00 - 06:51:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Shaker 6, white 280 - 420 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:51:00 - 06:56:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
Shaker 7, white 40 - 120 Hz, 1000 cnt

06:56:00 - 07:01:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
Shaker 7, white 80 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

07:01:00 - 07:06:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
Shaker 7, white 180 - 220 Hz, 1000 cnt

07:06:00 - 07:11:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
Shaker 7, white 280 - 420 Hz, 1000 cnt

07:12:00 - 08:03:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
Swept, 50 - 300 Hz, 1 Hz resolution, 10 s in each frequency, 40 cnt

08:03:00 - 08:54:00
EXC channel : K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_EXC
REF : K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
Swept, 50 - 300 Hz, 1 Hz resolution, 10 s in each frequency, 40 cnt


MIF (ASC)
kentaro.komori - 1:36 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36381) Print this report
Tuning of drive align matrix for EX MN

[Tanaka, Komori]

Abstract:

We began tuning the drive align matrix of the EX MN to address the DSOFT Y issue.
In addition, we found that the openloop transfer function may depend on the beam spot position on the transmission QPD.

Details:

We are still experiencing the DSOFT Y issue, namely the significant phase delay observed in the openloop transfer function.
One possible solution is to tune the drive align matrix of the EX MN.

First, we focused on the L2P and L2Y values for EX.
We measured the transfer functions from MN L excitation to the TM oplev P and Y signals.
We found that the AC response of TM pitch improves when L2P is set to zero compared to the conventional value (+1.2), while that of TM yaw is similar between zero and the conventional value (−1.8).

Based on this result, we temporarily set L2P to zero.
However, the lock acquisition failed when the arm WFS was engaged, likely because the DC response gets worse without the +1.2 setting.
Therefore, we restored the original value, after which the IFO successfully reached the RF locked state.

After reaching the RF locked state, we measured the DSOFT Y openloop transfer function with and without the conventional L2P and L2Y values.
The results were similar regardless of these settings, and in fact worse than the previous openloop transfer function (Fig. 1).
This discrepancy may originate from a difference in the beam spot position on the X transmission QPD2 (Fig. 2).

Our current hypothesis is that the openloop transfer function depends on the beam spot position.
We will investigate this by adjusting the BPC offset.
In addition, when L2Y was set to zero, the DSOFT Y signal became significantly noisier.
We expect that fine-tuning this value may help reduce the fluctuation.

Images attached to this report
CRY (General)
nobuhiro.kimura - 21:47 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36379) Print this report
Comment to Maintenance Notes for Duct Shield Cryo-cooler Units (36285)

[Kimura and Yasui]
 On February 17, the consumable parts of the helium compressor for the duct shield cryo-cooler unit was replaced.
The consumable parts are the adsorber and filter unit. The compressors serviced was one unit: Yea.
 The helium gas inside the cold head of the duct shield cryo-cooler unit called Yea was replaced.
The pressure of the helium gas in the cold head is 12.5 bar. 
The grade of helium gas used was G1.

 Replacement of the helium gas in the cold heads of Yer is scheduled for February 18.

VIS (SRM)
ryutaro.takahashi - 18:37 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36378) Print this report
Comment to Preparation for SRM installation (36327)

[Takahashi, Ikeda]

We installed an LVDT Driver, an LVDT-ACT Distributor, and two High Power Coil Drivers into the SRM rack (Picture #1).

  • LVDT Driver: S1403138 for FLDACC
  • LVDT-ACT Distributor: S1503680 for FLDACC
  • HPCD: S2315291 for FLDACC
  • HPCD: S2315288 for IRM damper

We checked the FLDACCs transported from NAOJ (Mitaka). Unfortunately, the folded pendulum blocks have been broken (Picture #2). Though the proof masses were fixed with the stopper screws and sims, all of the hinges were cut (Pictures #3 and #4). The stopper screws may not be enough to fix the proof mass tightly. It has a high risk to transport assembled FLDACCs. Therefore, the folded pendulum blocks should be assembled at the site. Spare blocks will be sent with the fixing covers that sandwich the block with the piercer bolts.

Images attached to this comment
IOO (OMC)
takahiro.yamamoto - 17:34 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36377) Print this report
Comment to OMC_LSC guardian stops due to the camera error (36311)
I prepared a new OMC_LSC guardian code to use the new camera_client (see also klog#36370) for taking pictures.
It's not deployed yet, but we can start to test soon.

-----
To proper management about a process of taking picture, self.taking_snapshot and self.analyzing_mode sub-states had to be divided two sub-states, respectively. For this reason, FIND_RESONANCE* states were drastically rewritten. We considered two approaches for backgrounding a taking picture process. One is to load camera_client as a python module and to call its function under a thread pool. Another one is to execute it via subprocess. Former one is better from the view point of avoiding zombie processes. But a code becomes complicated. Because OMC_LSC guardian must be understood by many people (most of commissioners), we decided to use subprocess method for easy code reading.

A new code and differences can be found as
- /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/omc/k1/guardian/OMC_LSC_new_camera_client.py
- /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/omc/k1/guardian/patches/OMC_LSC-new-camera-client_260217.patch
DetChar (General)
nami.uchikata - 17:01 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36375) Print this report
Segments for CAT1
We have prepared CAT1 segment lists for O4a and O4c. In addition to IPC errors, we include the edge of science mode to CAT1 as follows,
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4a.xml
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4a_active.txt
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4a_known.txt
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4c.xml
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4c_active.txt
/home/detchar/Segments/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE/K1-GRD_SCIENCE_MODE_EDGE_3SEC_O4c_known.txt
VIS (SRM)
satoru.ikeda - 16:06 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36374) Print this report
Comment to Preparation for SRM installation (36327)

[Ushiba-san, R.Takahashi-san, Ikeda]

Prepared the model files for FLDACC and IRM dampers.
This time, only model editing was performed; make and install have not yet been executed.

Basic Design
Modifications to k1vissrmt.mdl and k1vissrmp.mdl

・First, all elements broken from the common model due to the K-Log#17302 fix were removed. They were changed to use blocks common with other Type-B models.

・k1vissrmt.mdl
 Added input from adc and output to dac to FLDACC.
 Input: adc0_{28,29,30}
 Output: dac1_{8,9,10}

・PAYLOAD_MASTER.mdl
 Copied PAYLOAD_MASTER (shared by Type-B and Bp) and created a new PAYLOAD_TYPEB_MASTER. Added a block for the IRM damper inside it.

・k1vissrmp.mdl
  Replaced with the PAYLOAD_TYPEB_MASTER block and added IRM_COIL output as output to the DAC.
  Output: dac1_{4,5,6}
 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
PEM (Center)
Carl Blair - 14:25 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36371) Print this report
Comment to Jitter Coupling Investigations (36369)

[Alex , Carl] Adding some figure of the IMC QPDA2 (note typo in original klog) centerring loop glitches, first figure left shows 4 segments, middle shows pitch and yaw, right shows sum channels. Second figure shows same the moment the centerring loop is turned off. Third figure shows the centerring loop error signal spectrum, centering on and off.  

We tried to investigate further this morning.  With the IMC locked we did not see any centerring loop glitches.  Figure 4 shows QPDA2 pitch spectrum with centerring on and off (no change). We tried to make glitches by driving the piezo start 3:25:00 UTC with a 0.1Hz sin wave with amplitude up to 10V, which is more than the actuation range used during a normal lock.  We also adjusted the DC offset to match the lock from yesterday afternoon and still saw no glitches,  At 10V drive we only just start to see a coherent signal on the QPD.  This test was made after the IMC input alignment piezo was offloaded, but I can not see why they would be related.

Images attached to this comment
PEM (Center)
takaaki.yokozawa - 14:01 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36372) Print this report
Install the shakers and accelerometers at the IFI chamber
[Tanaka, Yokozawa]

We installed the shakers and accelerometers at the IFI chamber.

Shakers
K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_1_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_2_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_3_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-EXCITATION_MCF0_RACK_4_OUT_DQ

Accelerometers (TESC706)
K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB5_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB6_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB7_OUT_DQ
K1:PEM-PORTABLE_MCF_RACK_MCF0_ADC1_DSUB8_OUT_DQ
Images attached to this report
IOO (IMC)
kenta.tanaka - 13:50 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36373) Print this report
IMC ASC PZT1 PIT was offloaded

As reported in klog36369 by Carl-san, IMC ASC PZT1 PIT was saturated since Dec. 29, 2025. I offloaded this by tweaking the mirror manually. Now PZT1 works well even if IMC output is ~5.5 W.

DGS (General)
takahiro.yamamoto - 2:44 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36370) Print this report
Update of camera_client script

Abstract

This is a client-side improvement for the issue of OMC_TRANS camera klog#36311.
Although it's not impossible, I understood that drastic structural changes are required for server-side improvements about this issue.
In other words, it will likely be a very long-term task.
So I made a client-side improvement as a quick-aid.
 

How to use

Now /kagra/camera_client.py can take a snapshot with -p/--photo option as
controls@k1grd0:~$ /kagra/camera_client.py -c OMC_TRANS -p
or as a python module like as
controls@k1grd0:~$ python3
>>> import sys
>>> sys.path.append('/kagra/apps/camera/bin')
>>> import camera_client as cc
>>> cc.camera_client('OMC_TRANS', Photo=True)
pipeline_str = udpsrc multicast-group=239.192.0.47 port=65000 ! application/x-rtp,payload=96,clock-rate=90000 ! rtpjitterbuffer latency=200 ! rtph264depay ! avdec_h264 ! videoconvert ! video/x-raw,format=RGB ! appsink name=sink emit-signals=true max-buffers=1 drop=true
Waiting for first keyframe...
Saved /kagra/camera/images/OMC_TRANS_2026-02-16-22-49-39.tiff
>>>

without a limitation of the interval.
 

Details

One major?/minor? change is to remove overlay text as shown in Fig.1. Camera name is show in normal as a left image, but it's not for OMC_TRANS now as shown in a right image. Overlay text is merged to original camera image on the camera-server application. So what we can do as a client-side improvement is only to remove overlay text completely by using the server settings ('overlay_scilence = true'). I'm not sure an importance of the overlay text for commissioners, so I'd like to know it's okey or not. If the mode analysis code isn't affected by the overlay text, it may be restorable. If it's affected and the overlay text is necessary, we may need to give up the client-side improvement.

If it's acceptable, I'll update OMC_LSC guardian again to use this function. At this time, I plan to update drastically also another functions such as get_latest_file() which is used without any check about return value in spite of returning an indeterminate type (str or None) etc.

This function is probably required only by OMC_LSC guardian, so "take snap" on MEDM screens are still a server-side shooting with an interval limitation. An advantage of shooting on the server-side is that it can be executed simply via EPICS. On the other hand, an advantage on the client-side is that it's easy to separate directory structure. The server application provides figure files in /kagra/camera/images/%Y/%m/%d/figure_files. So the CPU cost of finding image files and removing used files by OMC_LSC guardian will be increased in time. camera_client.py can provide image files also in /kagra/camera/images/, so finding and removing image files can be always done with minimum cost.
 

Memo

In the case of x-rtp protocol via udpsrc, pre-defined sink element which can be used in one-liner command cannot catch the first packet of each frame. Because of this gst-launch and/or ffmpeg commands cannot convert streaming video to the image file stably (rarely success, mostly fail). For this reason, the sink element which has a function to start caputuring with the first packet of frames as a trigger was prepared as a python function. And also, rtph264depay as a streaming receiver was not stable, so the rtpjitterbuffer element was inserted. Though it seems work fine now, it may be better to adjust buffer latency size more precisely (depending on bitrate, network situation, etc.?).

Images attached to this report
PEM (Center)
Carl Blair - 17:13 Monday 16 February 2026 (36369) Print this report
Jitter Coupling Investigations

[Kenta, Alex, Washimi, Yokozawan, Carl]

We would like to improve jitter coupling projections.  Previously the mode cleaner was used to excite jitter 40-200Hz and IMMT2 trans QPDs were used as witness sensors to project that jitter noise to DARM.  The mode cleaner was only excied in one degree of freedom, exciting MCE.  We had tried but failed to excite the other degree of freedom (with MCI and MCO).  The shaker tests might indicate jitter noise can be excited on the PSL table.  We therefore planned today to excite angle at mirror M17 on the PSL table with a linear combination of IMC PZT1 and PZT2 to see if we find the same coupling function as the shaker test noise projection around 210Hz.  We found that PZT1 was saturated and that QPDA1 was very noisey so wee did not make the measurement exactly as planned.  The PZT needs manual ofloading, we will do that tomorrow.  QPDA1 glitches seem to comer fom the piezo in the centerring loop on the QPD.  When the loop is opened the glitches stop (but the low frequency beam position noise increases).  We made a measurement in PZT2 pitch that can be used for noise projection.  One a swept sin measurement and another a broadband measurement focussingon the 210Hz coupling frequency (attached). Projectionswill be processed tomorrow.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
Carl Blair - 14:25 Tuesday 17 February 2026 (36371) Print this report

[Alex , Carl] Adding some figure of the IMC QPDA2 (note typo in original klog) centerring loop glitches, first figure left shows 4 segments, middle shows pitch and yaw, right shows sum channels. Second figure shows same the moment the centerring loop is turned off. Third figure shows the centerring loop error signal spectrum, centering on and off.  

We tried to investigate further this morning.  With the IMC locked we did not see any centerring loop glitches.  Figure 4 shows QPDA2 pitch spectrum with centerring on and off (no change). We tried to make glitches by driving the piezo start 3:25:00 UTC with a 0.1Hz sin wave with amplitude up to 10V, which is more than the actuation range used during a normal lock.  We also adjusted the DC offset to match the lock from yesterday afternoon and still saw no glitches,  At 10V drive we only just start to see a coherent signal on the QPD.  This test was made after the IMC input alignment piezo was offloaded, but I can not see why they would be related.

Images attached to this comment
Alexandra Adam - 11:31 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36384) Print this report

[Alex, Carl]

We analysed the data from the white noise injection. White noise was injected into PZT2 with bandpass filter from 200 Hz to 250 Hz and a gain of 0.6. We found that IMC-REFL_QPDA2_PIT_OUT_DQ had the highest coherence. Using the method described in Environmental Noise in Advanced LIGO Detectors we calculated the coupling function for the IMC-REFL to DARM. Where possible the coupling function is given however when the injected noise was not large enough in DARM or in the IMC-REFL the coupling is labelled with a upper or lower limit. Where neither was high enough no coupling factor was displayed. The thresholds used were a factor of 2 for the ratio the DARM ASD of the background to the injection and a factor of 2.5 for the witness sensor.

The coupling from 200-250 Hz appears to be flat with a coupling function of ~9. A comparison with this estimate is attached

 

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
PEM (Center)
tatsuki.washimi - 14:49 Monday 16 February 2026 (36367) Print this report
Summary of the PSL PEM injection and QPDs excess

 

By my eyes

X  : Well excited 
△: Little excited
-   : Not excited  

Channel Name Acoustic Shaker 1 Shaker 2 Shaker 3 Shaker 4
K1:PSL-IP_QPD1_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX X X X
K1:PSL-IP_QPD2_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX X X X
K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ - - - -
K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ - -
K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ - - - - -
K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ - - - - -
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX XX X XX XX
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_I_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX XX X XX XX
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_Q_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ X X X
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_DC_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX XX X XX XX
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_I_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX XX X XX XX
K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_Q_{PIT, YAW}_OUT_DQ XX XX X XX XX
Images attached to this report
CRY (General)
shoichi.oshino - 13:34 Monday 16 February 2026 (36368) Print this report
Stopping water pump monitoring
Due to Kimura-san's request, monitoring of the water pumps in the center, Xend, and Yend area (CRY_MON guardian) has been stopped.
PEM (Center)
tatsuki.washimi - 12:52 Monday 16 February 2026 (36366) Print this report
Comment to PEM injection 260130 (36250)

I checked responses of QPDs related to the PSL, IMC, and IMMT, for the acoustic injection tests on Jan. 30th.

  • Well excited channels
    • K1:PSL-IP_QPD1_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:PSL-IP_QPD1_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:PSL-IP_QPD2_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:PSL-IP_QPD2_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_I_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_I_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_Q_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA1_RF14_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_I_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_I_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_Q_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-REFL_QPDA2_RF14_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ
  • Little excited channels
    • K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ'
    • K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-IMMT1_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
  • Not excited channels
    • K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA1_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    • K1:IMC-MCE_TRANS_QPDA2_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
Images attached to this comment
MIF (General)
takaaki.yokozawa - 8:54 Monday 16 February 2026 (36365) Print this report
Binary range decreasing
In this morning, the NS-NS binary range was unstable and f^-2 like spectrum can be seen below 100 Hz.
And I noticed that the PRCL to DARM projection spectrum also increasing when f^-2 noise detected.

I checked the err and feedback signal of LSC, several glitch like signal can be seen in both PRCL err and feedback signals.
Is that mystery?

Actually, the PRCL RF PD (POP 45) signal had several glitches only the unstable BNS range
Images attached to this report
IOO (OMC)
takafumi.ushiba - 12:39 Saturday 14 February 2026 (36364) Print this report
Comment to OMC_LSC guardian stops due to the camera error (36311)

OMC_LSC guardian stops again because no snapshot file is found (fig1).
This time, FIND_RESONANCE state was once passed but the OMC lockloss happened soon after OMC lock and the guardian tried to lock OMC again within 1 minute.

To solve this problem, I think up two ideas:
1. Wait 60 seconds at the end of DOWN state. This will guarantee the last image taking is at least 1 minute before the previous image taking.
2. Move find image process into exception handling by using try-except.

Probably, it is better to use the 2nd idea but I modified the guardian based on the first idea at this moment (fig2) because I have no time to test the code very well.

In addition, I confirmed LSC_LOCK guardian stops at LOCK_PREP state as we expect because the one of latch switchfor OMC protection function is closed (fig3).

Images attached to this comment
VIS (General)
takafumi.ushiba - 23:18 Friday 13 February 2026 (36363) Print this report
TF measurements for Type-A noise budget

I ran the automeasurement script on the remote desktop session of k1ctr5.
If someone would like to stop the script, please send the command Ctrl+C on the terminal opened on the remote session of k1ctr5.

In this time, I only measured TF that had significant coherence with DARM in the previous measurement (klog35621).

Comments to this report:
takafumi.ushiba - 23:33 Wednesday 18 February 2026 (36391) Print this report

I ran the automeasurement script on the remote desktop session of k1ctr5 to finish the TF measurement for Type-A suspensions.
If someone would like to stop the script, please send the command Ctrl+C on the terminal opened on the remote session of k1ctr5.

Note:

Since excitation flag remains on some models, alignment recoader guardian stops to recoad the IFO alignment.
So I deleted the excitation flag to activate alignment recoader guardian.
Since the current LSC_LOCK guardian needs to update the good oplev values by alignment recoader guardian during lock acquisition, IFO cannot be locked if the excitation flag remains.
So, if  the guardian stops at ALIGNING OMC state for a long time, it would be better to check the excitation flag of all models.

Search Help
×

Warning

×