[Takahashi, Ushiba]
We measured the transfer function from the H2+H3 actuator for the IRM damper to the Oplev yaw "IRM_OLDAMP_Y" in OLDAMP_OFF mode with "TM_OLDAMP_P&Y" on. The fundamental mode at 59mHz was visible, and the higher modes were damped by IM and TM servos.
[Smith, Tanaka, Hirose, Fujimoto, Saito]
The mount of a mirror located near the BS was found to be malfunctioning, so it was replaced. As a result, this mirror can now be used for alignment. The power of the main laser incident on the PLL RFPD was measured and found to have increased from approximately 19 μW (klog:37020) before the BS was replaced with a mirror in klog:37058 to approximately 69 μW. Mirrors and lenses were then installed according to the redesigned optical layout. In the PLL path, the mode-matching ratio between the main laser and the sub-laser was found to be approximately 33%. This is due to a mismatch in the waist positions. If the waist positions are matched, the mode-matching ratio is expected to improve to approximately 94%. Therefore, we plan to modify the sub-laser optical path length after the 50 mm focal-length lens. The mode-matching ratio for the optical path that injects the sub-laser into the interferometer will be evaluated in the next measurement.
Next, the mirrors and lenses used in the PLL optical path were reinstalled according to the redesigned optical layout (Fig. 1). The beam profile was measured after the 50 mm focal-length lens and fitted (Fig. 2). The waist positions and waist radii obtained from the fitting are listed below. The coordinate origin is defined at the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9) where the main-laser and sub-laser beams are combined.
Sub-laser
x direction: Waist position= −236.3 ± 3.0 mm, Waist radius= 0.0835 ± 0.0011 mm
y direction: Waist position= −237.6 ± 2.3 mm, Waist radius= 0.0786 ± 0.0008 mm
→Average: Waist position= −237 mm, Waist radius= 0.081 mm
For comparison, the beam-profile results of the main laser from klog:37020 were used:
Main laser
x direction: Waist position= −220.1 ± 3.7 mm, Waist radius= 0.0577 ± 0.0006 mm
y direction: Waist position= −170.7 ± 7.6 mm, Waist radius= 0.0674 ± 0.0014 mm
→Average: Waist position= −195.4 mm, Waist radius= 0.0626 mm
Using these results, the mode-matching ratio was calculated to be approximately 33%. Since the waist positions differ by 41.5 mm, the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9), where the main and sub-laser beams are combined, needs to be moved 20.8 mm to the right in Fig. 1. If the waist positions are perfectly matched, the mode-matching ratio is expected to improve to approximately 94%. In addition, one of the mirrors in the main-laser optical path was moved slightly relative to its position in klog:37020. Therefore, before moving the beam sampler (R:T = 1:9), we plan to remeasure the beam profile of the main laser and determine the required adjustment based on the new measurement results. Once the mode-matching ratio has been improved, the beat signal will be investigated again.
Finally, based on the optical layout shown in Fig. 1, four additional mirrors were installed to increase the optical path length of the sub-laser beam directed toward the interferometer. As a result, the 200 mm and 150 mm focal-length lenses require little or no repositioning. In the next measurement, beam profiles will be measured both before and after the waist to confirm whether the waist position is correct. If satisfactory mode matching is achieved, alignment of the sub-laser beam into the interferometer will then be performed.
[Smith, Hirose, Saito]
A 100 mm focal-length lens was placed before the FI to reduce the beam diameter, and the beam profile remained clean after passing through the FI. This indicates that the large beam diameter of the sub-laser was likely the cause of the distortion. Another 100 mm focal-length lens was then placed after the FI, and the beam profile after this lens was measured. Based on the results, the optical layout will be modified.
Next, another 100 mm focal-length lens was placed after the FI so that the beam divergence would be similar to that before the first lens was inserted. The beam profile after this second lens was then measured and fitted (Fig. 2). The waist positions and waist radii obtained from the fitting are as follows:
x direction: Waist position= 952.2 ± 2.2 mm, Waist radius= 0.1782 ± 0.0014 mm
y direction: Waist position= 960.8 ± 1.8 mm, Waist radius= 0.1790 ± 0.0012 mm
→Average: Waist position= 957 mm, Waist radius= 0.179 mm
In the next experiment, the optical layout will be modified based on these waist parameters. Specifically, we plan either to move the 200 mm focal-length lens by +270 mm and the 150 mm focal-length lens by +296 mm, or to increase the optical path length by 1600 mm.
[Saito, Hirose, Tanaka, Ushiba, Fujimoto]
We built and tested a transimpedance circuit for an AC-coupled PD to be used for the SRCL and PRCL length measurements.
The designed parameters are a high-pass cutoff of 0.5 Hz, a low-pass cutoff of 100 kHz, and a transimpedance of 10 kOhm.
In the test using voltage injection from Moku:Lab, we obtained results consistent with the LTspice simulation.
Next, we plan to attach a photodiode to the board and build a mount to fix the board on the optical table.
Background
For the SRCL and PRCL length measurements, the main laser is locked to the interferometer, and an auxiliary laser phase-locked to the main laser is scanned to measure the flashes.
During this measurement, the transmitted light of the main laser is also incident on the PD and disturbs the measurement. Therefore, the DC component and low-frequency fluctuations of this light need to be removed. For this purpose, an AC-coupled PD is required, and we built a transimpedance circuit for it.
Design of the transimpedance circuit
Fig. 1 shows the circuit diagram of the designed transimpedance circuit. The important parameters are as follows:
Fig. 2 shows the simulated frequency response of the transimpedance.
Assembly of the transimpedance circuit
Fig. 3 shows a photo of the transimpedance circuit built on a universal board.
Test of the transimpedance circuit
We tested the circuit by connecting Moku:Lab and measuring the transfer function from the input voltage to the output voltage.
Since Moku:Lab has a 50 Ohm output impedance, the circuit diagram when it is connected to the transimpedance circuit is as shown in Fig. 4.
The simulated gain expected in this configuration is shown in Fig. 5, where the gain in the flat region is expected to be 46 dB.
Fig. 6 shows the measurement result. The measured result agrees well with the simulation, indicating that the circuit is working properly.
Tomorrow, we plan to attach a photodetector (FGA21, Thorlabs) to the board we built. We also plan to make a mount so that the board can be fixed on the optical table.
I offloaded the F1 GAS with the FR.
I offloaded the BF GAS with the FR.
[Kimura and Yasui]
On JUne 15, we had a final vacuum leak test for SRM.
Then we detected a vacuum leak in the range of 1×10^-10 Pa·m³/s at the side flange on the +X side.
We confirmed that there were no other leaking flanges besides this one.
[Ushiba, Smith, Saito]
We measured the upstream laser power, which had not been measured previously, and found that the transmission of the FI was approximately 86%, indicating that there was no unexplained laser power loss. The beam profile of the sub-laser itself was also measured and found to be clean. However, when the beam profile was measured after reflection from the beam sampler (R:T = 9:1), the beam shape became distorted. This suggests that the FI was causing the problem. Since the sub-laser beam diameter may be too large relative to the maximum allowable beam diameter of the FI, we plan to place a lens before the FI in the next measurement to reduce the beam diameter and investigate whether the beam profile improves after transmission through the FI.
First, we measured the upstream laser power, which had not been measured previously. The measurements were performed using a power meter with an OD = 2.0 ND filter. The results were as follows:
Immediately after the sub-laser output: 24 mW
Reflected by the PBS: 3 mW
Transmitted through the PBS: 21 mW
Before the FI: 21 mW
After the FI: 18 mW
After reflection from the beam sampler (R:T = 9:1): 16.6 mW
Before the BS: 16.5 mW
Therefore, the transmission of the FI was approximately 86%, and there appears to be no significant laser power loss elsewhere in the optical path. In other words, clipping does not seem to be occurring.
Next, we measured the beam profile near the beam waist using a beam profiler and observed a beam profile similar to that reported previously (klog:37065). To identify the source of the distortion, we first removed the HWP closest to the sub-laser and replaced it with a mirror, then measured the beam profile of the sub-laser itself (Fig. 1). The beam shape of the sub-laser appeared clean. Next, the mirror was replaced with the original HWP, and the beam profiler was placed after the reflection from the beam sampler (R:T = 9:1) to measure the beam profile (Fig. 2). In this case, the beam shape became distorted. We then removed the FI and measured the beam profile again, finding that the beam shape returned to a clean profile (Fig. 3). This indicates that the FI is likely responsible for the distortion. To investigate further, we measured the beam diameter at the FI input and output locations. The results were:
At the FI input:
x: 1.869 mm
y: 1.687 mm
At the FI output:
x: 2.075 mm
y: 2.121 mm
The maximum beam diameter specified for the FI (IO-3-1064-HP) is 2.7 mm, suggesting that the beam diameter may be too large for proper operation. In the next measurement, we plan to install a lens before the FI to reduce the beam diameter and determine whether the beam profile becomes cleaner after passing through the FI.
[Smith, Hirose, Saito]
A 100 mm focal-length lens was placed before the FI to reduce the beam diameter, and the beam profile remained clean after passing through the FI. This indicates that the large beam diameter of the sub-laser was likely the cause of the distortion. Another 100 mm focal-length lens was then placed after the FI, and the beam profile after this lens was measured. Based on the results, the optical layout will be modified.
Next, another 100 mm focal-length lens was placed after the FI so that the beam divergence would be similar to that before the first lens was inserted. The beam profile after this second lens was then measured and fitted (Fig. 2). The waist positions and waist radii obtained from the fitting are as follows:
x direction: Waist position= 952.2 ± 2.2 mm, Waist radius= 0.1782 ± 0.0014 mm
y direction: Waist position= 960.8 ± 1.8 mm, Waist radius= 0.1790 ± 0.0012 mm
→Average: Waist position= 957 mm, Waist radius= 0.179 mm
In the next experiment, the optical layout will be modified based on these waist parameters. Specifically, we plan either to move the 200 mm focal-length lens by +270 mm and the 150 mm focal-length lens by +296 mm, or to increase the optical path length by 1600 mm.
I implemented the GAS modal damping control of SR2 into the guardian (fig1).
As discussed in klog36787, only M1 modal damping is engaged with IMV damping.
In addition, I disengaged the sensor correction of F0 GAS because it would conflict with the modal damping controls.
After implementation into the guardian, I tested and no issue was found.
I performed the regular alignment for PMC with PICO because PMC trans. power was lower than 20 W and PMC REFL camera image got brighter than before.
Now, PMC trans. power was back to 23.2 W and the REFL camera image got darker.
