[Komori, Tanaka, YokozaWashimi]

We performed the Hammering test for the IFI stack (+X, +Y side stack).

• optical table -> optical table
• top stack -> optical table
• middle stack -> optical table
• bottom stack -> optical table
• base plate -> optical table
• ground -> optical table
• nothing -> optical table (as a reference)
• base plate -> base plate
• ground (leg) -> base plate
• ground (leg) -> ground
• ground (concrete) -> ground

I just noticed that I made a mistake in the number of outputs of the Whitining Filter in the mini-rack. The number of Whitining Filter outputs on the mini-rack is 8, not 4.
kTanaka-san just checked the empty input ports of ADC in IOO0, IOO1 rack.
The following are the empty input ports.

• IOO0 rack, ADC0: 8-19ch (FIG1)
• IOO0 rack, ADC1: 24-31ch(FIG2)
• IOO0 rack, ADC2: 4-11ch 20-27ch (FIG3, FIG4)
• IOO0 rack, ADC3: no the empty input port(FIG5)
• IOO1 rack: no the empty input port(FIG6)

For the mini-rack, I would like to use 4-11ch and 20-27ch in ADC2 and additionally 8-15ch in ADC0 and 24-31ch in ADC1.
I will check with others to confirm that we can use this port as an addition. Also, do additional cabling.

 Komori, Tanaka

We confirmed that the beam positon of the reflection from PRM which is in the "MISALIGNED_BF" state seems to be almost the center of the HP beam dump. (see attached movie) 

## what we did

• When IMMT1 and 2 were the ALIGNED state and PRM was the MISALIGNED_BF state, we locked IMC with ASC.
• Then we stopped the ASC by inputting 0 in the IMC ASC input gain.
• We confirmed the beam position on the HP beam dump and found it is almost the center of the dump.  

[Ikeda, Takahashi]

We checked the OSEMs again. We took pictures of the OSEMs with a 360º camera (THETA). The flap for the OSEM#1, #4, and #5 were rotated by 40~50°.

[Hirata, Dan Chen-san]

We recovered PR3 suspension. Oplev position is around center, and IM V1 OSEM value (K1:VIS-PR3_IM_OSEMINF_V1_INMON) is about 6200.

1. Firstly we moved IM pitch and yaw by IM Pico, and recovered Oplev position to 0. We moved pitch -23000, yaw -700.
2. IM V1 OSEM was still around 9900. So we started to adjust IM V1 OSEM.
3. Locked suspended breadboard.
4. Locked IRM.
5. Adjusted IM V1 OSEM. 
6. Released IRM, and confirmed IM V1 OSEM value(K1:VIS-PR3_IM_OSEMINF_V1_INMON). It is about 6200.
7. Checked that Oplev is around center.
8. Released suspended breadboard.
9. Closed chamber, and confirmed Guardian can go to "aligned" state(Pic1). After that, we changed it to "Safe".

posted by Miyoki instead of Kimura-san for the past activities on 24th April.

The gasket surface of the removed IFI flange was visually inspected. Based on the visual inspection results, the following three points are estimated to have caused this flange to leak.
1. scratches on the gasket surface of the flat flange with copper flange (thin vertical scratches can be observed when shining a light on it) One location
2. Scratches on the metal gasket surface (thin vertical scratches can be observed when illuminated by light) One scratch
Possibly traces of 1.
Uneven traces on the gasket seal surface If the gasket is tightened properly, the trace will be a circle of uniform width. Since the traces on the actual product are narrow and wide, there is a high possibility that the initial tightening of the claw clamps was not uniform.

Here are the countermeasures.
Since the instructions call for the flat flange with copper flange to be returned to the original mirror plate instead of using the copper flange, repair of the scratches on the flat flange gasket surface will not be performed. Instead, a visual inspection of the original mirror plate gasket surface is performed before installation. In addition, the gasket will be changed from a metal gasket to an elastomer gasket.

We connected the new cables to the photosensors and confirmed that the sensor is working.
Also, we checked the signals while touching the cables around BF but there seems no glitch.
So, new cables seems working well.

We will tie up the cables and fix them onto the payload.

[Hirata, Dan Chen-san]

We took photos for PRM payload earthquake stops. I uploaded today's photo to KAGRA dropbox.

During this work, we found two earthquake stops for test mass AR side were very close to the mirror surface(within 1mm?). We talked with Takahashi-san and Ushiba-san, and decided to withdraw them.

I checked the motion of the F0Y FR. I operated the stepper motor from -4563 step by 1000 steps. The BF Y signal didn't change until -16563 step. When I added one more -1000 step, the signal was changed from -770 to -850. Though the signal went back to -770 by 1000 steps, it didn't go in the plus direction anymore. The motor is working, but the motion of the wire receptacle on the bearing is not smooth due to the large friction.

[Ushiba, Tamaki, Komori, Takahashi]

We continued the photosensor recovery. The replaced cables were fixed onto the bottom of BF, the cable anchor (small hexagon), and the suspension rod with cable ties.

sorry, the legend was clipped.

It is same for all plots.

I plotted the high-resolution (3-hour data, 128s FFT) ASDs and Coherences for the geophones and ACCs on the OMC chamber, for the night time before vacuum breaking.

Miyakawa, Tanaka

### abstract

We found that the interlock that is sensing the temp on the beam dumper is activated. We reset the interlock according to the Uchiyama-san's info. Then the original fiber amp. started emitting laser. We don't know why the interlock was activated yesterday.

### What we did

• First, we turned off the fiber amp. and the seed laser and restart them, the situation did not changed. Second, we turned off them and disconnected the USB cable between the amp. and the control PC, then we restored them. However the situation did not changed. Furthermore, we turned off the amp. and the seed laser, disconnected the USB cable and turned off the PC. but the situation did not changed. At last, we turned off the amp., the seed laser and the PC, disconnected the USB cable and the power cable of the amp. We found the thermometer in the fiber amp. controller showed around 3 degrees even though the power cable was disconnected from the fiber amp. 
• Then, we found the amp. and the PC were connected by the USB cable -> the LAN cable -> the other USB cable. Mio-sensei said the amp. was controlled by supplying the power from the USB cable. So we suspected the PC could not supply enough power due to the LAN cable. So we tried to connected the PC and the amp. with only the USB cable directly. However, the situation did not changed.
• We brought the other fiber amp. into the PSL room. We connected the power cable, the USB cable and the interlock cable to the second fiber amp. in order to check the thermometer value when the amp. was turned on. In this time, we did not disconnected the tube from the water chiller and the input/output optical fibers from the original fiber amp.. We turned on the second fiber amp. with no emission and connected the controller app, then we found the thermometer of the second amp. became 3 degrees.  Moreover, we found the thermometer value was not changed even though we disconnected the power cable. It is the same behaviour as the original amp.. So we suspected something is wrong in the common condition with the orignal setup. 
• The common parts we used in the first and second amplifiers were the USB, power and interlock cables; replacing the USB and power did not change the situation, so we suspected the remaining interlocks. After checking with Uchiyama-san, we learnt that the interlock is triggered by activation of one of the emergency stop buttons inside and outside the PSL and the temperature monitor on the beam dump that receives the reflected light from the PMC. We checked that the two emergency stop buttons were not activated and finally checked the temperature monitor and found that the indicator marked "ALM" was glowing red. According to Uchiyama-san, this was due to an interlock by the temperature monitor, so we tried to release this interlock. We then reconnected all the cables to the original fibre amplifier, switched it on and connected it to the controller app, and the thermometer readings now showed around 20 degrees. Finally, we succeeded in obtaining a laser output of 1 W at zero applied current. Unfortunately, we do not know at this point why the interlock was triggered yesterday. For now, we have returned the applied current value to the LD to its original value of 27.8 A.

[Hirata, Dan Chen-san]

We partially applied FC on PR3 HR side upper edge part. 15 min later, we pilled off FC. The target edge shape residues were successfully removed. We can see new two small dots, but they are far from the center.

1. Locked suspended breadboard
2. Locked suspension（IM→RM→TM）
3. Took surface photo
4. FC apply
5. 15min later pilled off FC
6. Took surface photos
7. released suspension (TM→RM→IM)
8. released suspended breadboard

I uploaded today's photo to KAGRA dropbox.

Tomorrow morning, we will recover suspension.

Yamamoto, Tanaka

After today's maintenance work we noticed that the laser output was at zero. We checked how long it had been zero and found that the laser output had dropped to zero all at once at around 10:50 today. According to Yamamoto-san, this was before the maintenance work had been carried out.

Later, when we looked at the laser controller screen via the webcam in the PSL, we saw the error message "temperature too High, Master Fault" (Fig, 1) The temperature displayed on the controller was 52°C, which was much higher than the nominal value of 23°C.

When we entered the mine, we first checked whether the chiller was working properly, and the chiller temperature display showed a nominal value of 19 degrees Celsius, which seemed to be working properly.

We then entered the PSL and touched the enclosure of the fibre amplifier and did not feel any heat in the enclosure. I also held up a sensor card around the laser's output port and found that a very weak light was emitted. The "seed" value on the controller was about 1.4. According to Nakano-san's manual, this "seed" value indicates the incident power to the fibre amplifier and should be between 1.0 and 2.5 as a nominal value. In other words, the incident power is considered to be normal. The current value of the NPRO controller was about 0.96 A, which is the nominal value, so the NPRO controller is probably normal.

According to Nakano-san's manual, in this case it was most likely a thermometer malfunction, which was fixed by switching off the laser, unplugging the connection cable from the amplifier to the PC and restarting the application, so we thought we would try this approach. However, at the beginning of the manual, there is a warning that if the amplifier is switched on while the seed laser is off, it may break down, while the operating procedure states that the power should be switched on from the amplifier. This contradicted the warning, and as we could not decide which was correct, we decided not to power down the whole laser today (although we are sure the warning is correct).

Instead, we first switched off the fibre amplifier only and restarted it. However, the situation remained the same. We then switched off the fibre amplifier, closed the app, and then restarted the amplifier and the app. However, the situation remained the same.

At this point, we noticed that before pressing the "ENABLE" button on the controller app, i.e. when the laser was not emitting, the thermometer on the controller was showing around 3.5°C, and when we pressed the "ENABLE " button was pressed, the value of the thermometer rose up to 52 degrees Celsius drastically. When the "STOP" button was pressed, the thermometer value suddenly dropped from 52°C to about 3.5°C. This seems to be an odd behaviour of the thermometer.

At any rate, as it was late, we finished today's investigation.

Tomorrow, we will try to restart the whole laser system including seed laser.
 

Abstract

Details

[Dan, Hirata, rTakahashi, Tamaki, Ushiba]

We installed three additional cables between BF and PF (B49, B50, and B51).
Then, we replaced Dsub connectors on BF.
Followings are the cable numbers before and after replacement,

Old cables are cut and clamped on the BF.
We will continue the cabling at PF stage tomorrow.

Note:

During the work, we removed radiation shield plates between BF and PF.
They are stored in the cryostt, and need to be reinstalled after finishing the cabling.

[YokozaWashimi]

We moved the 3-axial accelerometer and the impact hammer from the OMC area to the IFI area.

[Tomura, Kamiizumi, Hirose]   This work was done on Friday, 26/04/2024.

Continued from klog29281.

We connected the power cables of the circuits in the mini-rack to the power strips located on the mini-rack.
These power strips are connected to the 18 V and 24 V power strips in the IOO0 rack. Then, the following process was done to check the current value of the stable power supply in the computer room.

1. First, we made sure that the stable power supply was turned on and then we increased the limit value to the maximum. Specifically, turned the knob "CURRENT" to the right to increase the limit current amount to the maximum. (The "CURRENT" knob is 3 A per 1 turn. To raise it to a maximum of 30 A, it is advisable to find the required number of revolutions from the current limit value marked on the memo, turn it by that amount and check that the knob is at its maximum and no longer stuck).
2. To check that the circuits are connected from the stable power supply, turn on each circuit and check that the 'DC AMPERES' of the stable power supply rises.
   However, because the amount of current used by the 24V is very low, the 'DC AMPERES' of the 24V stable power supply could not be visually observed to rise.
3. Switch on everything, check the current value and set the limit values. The current value of the ± 24 V remained almost unchanged, so the limit values also remained the same as before. 

   	The current value	The limit value
   +18V	24A	27A
   -18V	14A	18A

   18 V may exceed 25 A depending on circuit usage. If 25 A is permanently exceeded, the power supply should be re-examined. I would like to proceed with this for now.

I checked the reason why ETMX was oscillated.
Figure 1 and 2 show the signals of NB filters and MN DAMP filters, respectively.

DOF5 and MN_DAMP_L was oscillated at 5.1 Hz, which should be damped by DOF5.
So, it is very likely that the reason of the oscillation is DOF5 NB filter.
This filter was optimized when ETMX is at 90 K, so it is neccesary to optimize it again at the current temperature.