Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
VIS (PRM)
fabian.arellano - 13:58 Wednesday 29 June 2022 (21311) Print this report
Comment to Health check of PRM (21230)

With Takahashi-san.

Summary: we calibrated the BF Damper vertical LVDTs.

We calibrated the SF LVDT and the BF Damper vertical LVDTs. There was no known problem with the SF LVDT, only with the BF Damper ones. However, we also measured data to double-check the previously measured value (klog 19431).

The table below shows the new calibration factors that must be  written in the medm screen. Comparison with the previous values from the medm screen is also shown. The new ones for the BF Damper are 1.86 times larger than the old ones.

Device calibration factor (cnt/mm) New calibration factor for medm screen (um/cnt) Old calibration factor in medm (um/cnt) Ratio New/Old
SF 3802.3 0.263 0.240 1.1
BF V1 1204.7 0.830 0.460 1.8
BF V2 842.65 1.187 0.704 1.7
BF V3 951.84 1.051 0.495 2.1

 

I wrote in the medm screen the new values only for the BF Damper Vertical LVDTs. I kept the current value for the SF LVDT  because the new value is close enough (within 10%) . I accepted the changes in the SDF (lines 7, 8 and 9 in screenshot).

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×