Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
IOO (General)
kenta.tanaka - 20:26 Wednesday 15 October 2025 (35340) Print this report
PMC, IMC, and PLLs were locked with the 3rd fiber amp. laser

Miyakawa, Uchiyama, Tanaka

## Abstract

This afternoon, we recovered the PMC, IMC, and PLLs, respectively.  They all appear to be working well.  The PMC UGF is ~3 kHz, the IMC UGF is ~160 kHz, and the PLL UGFs are ~20 kHz.  

We will leave the IMC locked overnight to monitor stability.

---

## What We Did

### PMC Lock with ~20 W from the Fiber Output

The PMC was successfully locked with 1 W output yesterday.  However, a TEM00-like mode was visible in the PMC REFL camera even though the PMC was locked to TEM00 (Fig. 1).  We realized we had forgotten that we removed the 20 dB attenuator between the RF LO and the EOM for PMC during a previous investigation into NeoLASE frequency noise (klog34997).  As a result, the modulation index was ~10× higher than in the previous setup. After reinstalling the attenuator, the TEM00-like mode in the REFL camera disappeared.  Thus, the observed TEM00 mode was actually the RF sideband, not the carrier.

Next, we used an IR viewer to inspect the beam path from the black box output to the PMC with 1 W input.  The beam spot appeared centered on each optic.  We then increased the power to 20 W and finely aligned the PMC input axis using pico motors. Figure 2 shows the REFL and TRANS camera images after fine alignment.  An LG mode appears dominant in the REFL image, suggesting that mode matching may need improvement.  

We also adjusted the fiber output so that the PMC transmission reached ~17 W, required to deliver ~10 W into the IMC.

We measured the PMC OLTF and tuned the servo's common gain to achieve a UGF of ~3 kHz.  Figure 3 shows the measured OLTF.  

(Note: I had forgotten that the gain from OUT1 to OUT2 is 10 dB, so the actual UGF corresponds to the –10 dB crossing point.  The UGF measured yesterday might have been >4 kHz.)

We updated the PMC guardian script accordingly.

We then measured the frequency noise following the same procedure as in klog35280, now with 20 W output.  Figure 4 shows the results:  

- **Red**: Fiber amp. @ 20 W  

- **Blue**: NeoLASE @ 20 W  

- **Green**: Fiber amp. @ 1 W  

Above 1 kHz, the red curve shows lower noise than both the blue and green.  The reason is unclear, but this result supports using the fiber amp. at 20 W.

---

### PLL Lock

After locking the PMC, we tuned the IR and GR temperatures for PLL locking.  However, both PLLs were already locked without adjustment.  Possibly, the IR laser's absolute frequency at 1.1 A coincided with those of the GR lasers.  In any case, we left the PLLs untouched.

We measured the PLL OLTFs.  

Figure 5 shows the results:  

  • Bright curve: PLL-Y  
  • Dark curve: PLL-X  

Both have UGFs around 20 kHz, consistent with klog35144.

---

### IMC Lock

Finally, we attempted to lock the IMC.  Before locking, we modified the feedback paths:

  • PZT path: Connected directly to laser PZT, removing the 150 kHz notch filter and 20 dB attenuator.  
  • EOM path: Connected directly to the fiber broadband EOM, removing the HV amplifiers.

This configuration matches the previous one used with the fiber amp. laser.

We then requested the IO guardian to enter the `IMC_LSC_LOCKED` state without changes.  The IMC locked, but the normalized transmission power was low, and the IMC TRANS beam spot flickered. After adjusting the IMC CMS common gain, the normalized transmission returned to ~1.  

We then measured the IMC OLTF (Fig. 6) and the crossover frequency between EOM and PZT.  

  • UGF: 120 kHz  
  • Crossover frequency: 10 kHz

We adjusted FASTGAIN of IMC CMS to set the cross-over frequency to 14 kHz. We noticed structures around 150 kHz in both TFs.  To investigate, we inserted an SR560 in the PZT path and tested different LPFs:

  • Common settings: DC coupling, ×1 gain  

Fig. 7 shows.the TF between the EOM loop and the PZT loop:  

  • Bright curve: 2nd-order LPF @ 100 kHz  
  • Dark curve: 1st-order LPF @ 30 kHz

The 30 kHz LPF provided better roll-off and a sufficient phase margin, so we adopted this configuration.

We remeasured the IMC OLTF.  Figure 8 shows the final result—the 150 kHz structure disappeared.  We then adjusted the common gain so that the IMC loop's UGF became **160 kHz**.  This improvement should allow us to increase the CARM UGF in future steps.

---

We will keep the IMC locked overnight to monitor the stability of the current setup.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
kenta.tanaka - 9:38 Thursday 16 October 2025 (35344) Print this report

This morining, we checked the stablility of IMC last night. Fig.1 shows the hours trend of {IMC, PMC, FIB} TRANS/OUTPUT powers, IMC, PMC error signals. My work last night was finshed until 21:00 JST, 10/15, 2025. Then, MCs are keeping to lock to 9:00 JST, 10/16. So the current lock duration is 12 hours. It is stable enough to lock PRFPMI.

Additionally, Fig.2 shows the days trend. more than 2 days before we used NeoLASE, There seems to be no glitch in the IMC error signal after switching the laser to fiber amp. like the glitch at the right cursor when we used NeoLASE. (One reason why the RMS itself was changed is that IMC CMS common gain was also changed. We need to compensate it to compare them.)

On the other hand, accoriding to the PMC trans. power in fig.1, the power seems to sometimes become noisy. Fig 3 shows the trend zoomed up around -2h. The power decreased somehow. However, FIB output power was not changed at that time. One of possibillities is that current laser temperature is close to mode-hop region.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 11:51 Thursday 16 October 2025 (35347) Print this report

Figure 1 shows the spectrum of IMC error signals measured by Moku:Lab.
The previous measurement results (with neoLase laser) can be seen in klog35281.
Note that the previous measurement was taken using SR560 with a gain of 10.

Since the noise spectrum around 200-300khz was larger than before with the nominal setting (thin line), I also tested the 1dB lower gain setting of IMC loop, which drastically change the spectrum (thick line).
So, the noise around 200-300khz seemed to enhanced by the gain peaking of control loop.

On the other hand, the noise below 100kHz seems better than that of the neoLase laser.
We will check if these difference change the IFO stability or not.

Images attached to this comment
takafumi.ushiba - 12:58 Thursday 16 October 2025 (35352) Print this report

Since nominal IMC CMS IN1 gain was changed due to the work reported in original post, I changed IMC CMS IN2 gain and LSC-MCL servo.
I changed IMC CMS IN2 gain from 7dB to 2dB because IN1 gain was changed frm 23dB to 18dB.
For MCL, I reduced the gain by -1.8dB so that crossover frequency of MCL keeps 100Hz.
Figure 1 shows the crossover frequency measurement result after gain adjustment, which seems fine.

Images attached to this comment
shinji.miyoki - 13:34 Thursday 16 October 2025 (35353) Print this report

>The 30 kHz LPF provided better roll-off and a sufficient phase margin, so we adopted this configuration.

A passive 1-pole (RC) 30kHz LPF is enough, low-noise and easy to make. It is better to ask Shimode-san to make it housed in a box with BNC connectors. For future usage, HV type capacitor should be used. I have it in Shimode-san's room. 

kenta.tanaka - 16:27 Thursday 16 October 2025 (35351) Print this report

After increasing the laser power (klog35349), we attempted to resolve the mode-hopping phenomenon reported in klog35344 by adjusting the temperature of the main IR crystal.  This time, we unlocked the IMC before making the temperature adjustments.

Figure 1 shows the original IR crystal temperature before the adjustment: 46.5°C.  We first decreased the temperature by 0.5°C from the original value, but this made the mode-hopping phenomenon even worse.  We then tried increasing the temperature, but could not go higher because the dial had already reached its upper limit.  Therefore, we further decreased the temperature by more than 1°C from the original setting.  Figure 2 shows the IR crystal temperature after adjustment: approximately 45°C. Figure 3 shows the PMC transmission power.  Before the adjustment (at the right cursor), large fluctuations were observed.  After the adjustment (left cursor), the transmission power appears to have stabilized.

Following this, PLLX and PLLY locked automatically via their respective guardians.  However, the TEMP BIAS offsets for both systems increased from 1.0 to ~1.5.  In this state, the GRX temperature was 30.1°C and the GRY temperature was 27.2°C, as shown in Figure 4.  We set both TEMP BIAS offsets back to 0 and manually adjusted each temperature to the desired value.

Note: We modified the PLL guardian so that the scan now starts from -1 instead of –2, since we know the good offset is typically around 0.

Images attached to this comment
shinji.miyoki - 12:14 Sunday 19 October 2025 (35375) Print this report

I compared the 20W and 30W stability before malfunction.

A 30W long-scale intensity fluctuation seemed to be worse than a 20W one. So more power seemed to trigger something in the FBL. 

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×