Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
tomotada.akutsu - 21:18 Friday 19 April 2024 (29283) Print this report
Finalization of IFI-IMM-PRM: Day 3 PM; rough check around IFI and IMM

Takano, Hirata, Akutsu; following 29282.

Afternoon, we checked beam dumps, and ghost beams caught by them in IFI and IMM chambers, and all seemed ok so far. The detailed check will be done next week.

  • During this work, C-2-6 blank flange of IFI chamber was detached (Figs. 1 and 2).
  • To do this, call PROVIDING_STABLE_LIGHT to IO Guardian, and then zero the ASC gain so that one can walk across the light beam toward IMMT1T (see also Day 1 work: 29261).
  • Useful tool: a sensor card attached to a dentist mirror
  • In addition, IMMT1 should be kept without oplev feedback tentatively when checking the back of IMMT1; this can be achieved by calling PAY_FLOAT to IMMT1 Guardian.
  • Do not hesitate to check REFL DC value and the relevant gige camera image when calling ALIGNED to PRM.
  • Refs: invac work finalization in 2022; you can link back from 22244. Highlight would be  2165521654, and 21578.
  • I would like to repeat that this kind of work requires at least two optical interferometer experiment experts...
Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
tomotada.akutsu - 11:21 Saturday 20 April 2024 (29285) Print this report

The attached figure shows a summary of the current situation IMMT2-PRM-PR2. How do you think about the next step??

  • IMMT2's centering is hard to be checked, though.
  • Need to also check input GRX spot on the back of PR2 HR target; this spot should overlap on an IR beam reflected at PR2 toward PR3 (not input from IMMT2 to PR2). According to Fig. 3 of 29261, this spot seems also illuminate +Y side of the center line on PR2 HR target, but this should come rather miuns Y side. The target moves together with PR2 traverser, while GRX beam path won't move together with the traverser, as the steering mirror POP-POM is on the suspended table. So this might indicate that PR2 would be dislocated in the minus Y direction now. If we can somehow move PR2 with the traverser in +Y side to some extent (5 mm would be too much? then a few mm...), these mis-centering might be resolved to some extent.

 

Images attached to this comment
tomotada.akutsu - 7:22 Wednesday 24 April 2024 (29304) Print this report

A modified drawing of 29285. We mis-understood that the nominal distance from the center of "the optical beam from PRM to PR2" and the center of the "PR2 HR mid baffle aperture" is about 6 mm according to JGW-T1910200-v4, while the correct nominal number of this center-to-center is 4.8 mm according to JGW-T2113078-v2. Hirata-san has confirmed 4.8 mm is correct center-to-center with CAD.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×