sorry, the legend was clipped.
It is same for all plots.
I plotted the high-resolution (3-hour data, 128s FFT) ASDs and Coherences for the geophones and ACCs on the OMC chamber, for the night time before vacuum breaking.
Miyakawa, Tanaka
### abstract
We found that the interlock that is sensing the temp on the beam dumper is activated. We reset the interlock according to the Uchiyama-san's info. Then the original fiber amp. started emitting laser. We don't know why the interlock was activated yesterday.
### What we did
[Hirata, Dan Chen-san]
We partially applied FC on PR3 HR side upper edge part. 15 min later, we pilled off FC. The target edge shape residues were successfully removed. We can see new two small dots, but they are far from the center.
I uploaded today's photo to KAGRA dropbox.
Tomorrow morning, we will recover suspension.
Yamamoto, Tanaka
After today's maintenance work we noticed that the laser output was at zero. We checked how long it had been zero and found that the laser output had dropped to zero all at once at around 10:50 today. According to Yamamoto-san, this was before the maintenance work had been carried out.
Later, when we looked at the laser controller screen via the webcam in the PSL, we saw the error message "temperature too High, Master Fault" (Fig, 1) The temperature displayed on the controller was 52°C, which was much higher than the nominal value of 23°C.
When we entered the mine, we first checked whether the chiller was working properly, and the chiller temperature display showed a nominal value of 19 degrees Celsius, which seemed to be working properly.
We then entered the PSL and touched the enclosure of the fibre amplifier and did not feel any heat in the enclosure. I also held up a sensor card around the laser's output port and found that a very weak light was emitted. The "seed" value on the controller was about 1.4. According to Nakano-san's manual, this "seed" value indicates the incident power to the fibre amplifier and should be between 1.0 and 2.5 as a nominal value. In other words, the incident power is considered to be normal. The current value of the NPRO controller was about 0.96 A, which is the nominal value, so the NPRO controller is probably normal.
According to Nakano-san's manual, in this case it was most likely a thermometer malfunction, which was fixed by switching off the laser, unplugging the connection cable from the amplifier to the PC and restarting the application, so we thought we would try this approach. However, at the beginning of the manual, there is a warning that if the amplifier is switched on while the seed laser is off, it may break down, while the operating procedure states that the power should be switched on from the amplifier. This contradicted the warning, and as we could not decide which was correct, we decided not to power down the whole laser today (although we are sure the warning is correct).
Instead, we first switched off the fibre amplifier only and restarted it. However, the situation remained the same. We then switched off the fibre amplifier, closed the app, and then restarted the amplifier and the app. However, the situation remained the same.
At this point, we noticed that before pressing the "ENABLE" button on the controller app, i.e. when the laser was not emitting, the thermometer on the controller was showing around 3.5°C, and when we pressed the "ENABLE " button was pressed, the value of the thermometer rose up to 52 degrees Celsius drastically. When the "STOP" button was pressed, the thermometer value suddenly dropped from 52°C to about 3.5°C. This seems to be an odd behaviour of the thermometer.
At any rate, as it was late, we finished today's investigation.
Tomorrow, we will try to restart the whole laser system including seed laser.
[Dan, Hirata, rTakahashi, Tamaki, Ushiba]
We installed three additional cables between BF and PF (B49, B50, and B51).
Then, we replaced Dsub connectors on BF.
Followings are the cable numbers before and after replacement,
Sensor name | cable number before replacement | cable number after replacement |
H2 (CRYO10) | B44 | B49 |
H3 (CRYO11) | B45 | B50 |
V3 (CRYO12) | B46 | B51 |
Old cables are cut and clamped on the BF.
We will continue the cabling at PF stage tomorrow.
Note:
During the work, we removed radiation shield plates between BF and PF.
They are stored in the cryostt, and need to be reinstalled after finishing the cabling.
[YokozaWashimi]
We moved the 3-axial accelerometer and the impact hammer from the OMC area to the IFI area.
[Tomura, Kamiizumi, Hirose] This work was done on Friday, 26/04/2024.
Continued from klog29281.
We connected the power cables of the circuits in the mini-rack to the power strips located on the mini-rack.
These power strips are connected to the 18 V and 24 V power strips in the IOO0 rack. Then, the following process was done to check the current value of the stable power supply in the computer room.
The current value | The limit value | |
+18V | 24A | 27A |
-18V | 14A | 18A |
18 V may exceed 25 A depending on circuit usage. If 25 A is permanently exceeded, the power supply should be re-examined. I would like to proceed with this for now.
I checked the reason why ETMX was oscillated.
Figure 1 and 2 show the signals of NB filters and MN DAMP filters, respectively.
DOF5 and MN_DAMP_L was oscillated at 5.1 Hz, which should be damped by DOF5.
So, it is very likely that the reason of the oscillation is DOF5 NB filter.
This filter was optimized when ETMX is at 90 K, so it is neccesary to optimize it again at the current temperature.
I requested SAFE state and checked the SDF after this work and klog29353.
Also, I turned the Pcal-X laser OFF.
I added loop_check and injection_check as Decorators in the CAL_PCAL guardian:
I added these Decorators in SAFE state and DOWN state of the guardian.
Date: 2024/4/30 early morning
I checked the Pcal-X beam positions on the ETMX, and no large change was found comparing to the last beam alignment works on 4/25 (klog29331).
Fig 1: picture on 4/25, fig 2: picture on 4/30=today.
Because of the ETMX suspension stuation repoted on klog29351, the suspension state was PAY_TRIPPED and I did not touch it, which means the Tcam picture can be differ a littlt.
Tcam direction changed a little?
I requested SAFE state and checked the SDF after this work and klog29353.
Also, I turned the Pcal-X laser OFF.
I checked the reason why ETMX was oscillated.
Figure 1 and 2 show the signals of NB filters and MN DAMP filters, respectively.
DOF5 and MN_DAMP_L was oscillated at 5.1 Hz, which should be damped by DOF5.
So, it is very likely that the reason of the oscillation is DOF5 NB filter.
This filter was optimized when ETMX is at 90 K, so it is neccesary to optimize it again at the current temperature.
I checked all TFs of PRM.
All TF seem fine though resonant frequency of GAS filter is shifted slightly.
Following is an additional note, which is not problematic.
1. BF coil DoF measurement have a larger gain than before because of the calibration factor update (klog21311 and klog21315).
I measured the spectra of PRM LVDTs and OSEMs (fig1, fig2)
All seem fine.
IMC LSC was often failed when holding the output of MCL feedback.
Since MCE actuator efficincy increased by a factor of 3 due to thechange of the magnet size, I added a gain of 0.3 at FM9 (gain) of IMC-MCL_SERVO filter bank.
I performed finer alignment of X arm with ADSs.
Followings are the procedure:
1. X arm lock with both IR and GR.
2. Engage ADSs for PR3 by using GRX PD.
3. Engage ADSs for PR2 and IMMT2 by using IRX PD.
4. Move ITMX and ETMX so that beam spot on both mirrors are good.
Left figure of fig1 and 2 show the beam spot on ITMX before the earthquake and now, respectively.
Left figure of fig3 and 4 show the beam spot on ETMX before the earthquake and now, respectively.
After the alignment, I recoarded the good OpLev values of IMMT2, PR2, PR3, ITMX, and ETMX.
Followings are the several notes we need to check.
1. IRX beam is not hit to the X arm trans IR camera.
2. GRX beam is shifted on the X arm trans GR camera.
3. We haven't checked the beam on TMSX, so I'm not so sure ADSs work fine (at least, trans power was increased thanks to ADSs, though).
4. IRX and GRX normalized transmission is around 0.7-0.8 now. I'm not so sure this value is due to the bad alignment, bad finesse, or clipping somewhere (GV between BS-IXC, GV between EXC-TMSX, optics on TMSX, and so on).
[Yokozawa, Ushiba]
During the work, we found that the OpLev beam was clipped by te RM, so we moved injection beam and in-vac mirror slightly to avoid cipping.
After rearrangement of the optics, we performed OpLev beam centering.
Hirata, Akutsu on 26 Apr 2024; following 29342.
Checked if ghost beams were within the relevant beam dumps in IMM chamber.
The same as 29342 basically. Plus, request IMMT1 Guardian to PAY_FLOAT, as we need to check behind IMMT1 and cut/shut the oplev beams.
For the reference drawing, see Fig. 1 of 21578 (finalization in 2022); but I think we would need the newer version of this...
Behind IMMT1, there are a pick off mirror (IMMT1T-POM) and a beam dump, while there are four transmission beams:
Fig. 1 shows the beam "1" and "2" mentioned above are within the IMMT1T-POM (pick off mirror). Fig. 2 shows the ghost beams "3" and "4" mentioned above are within the beam dump.
Fig. 3 shows the beam "2" mentioned above is dumped by the relevant beam dump. Due to the mirror-like surface of the structure, a vertual image of the sensor card and the ghost beam can be also seen; please not confused if there might be two ghost beams; it seems only one GB.
Fig. 4 shows a (actually two degenrated) ghost beam generated at a viewport window through which a beam for ISS passes. In theory there should be two ghost beams, but due to the narrow separation of the two beams, they can be caught with a single beam dump.