Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (ITF Control)
yutaro.enomoto - 22:24 Saturday 22 June 2019 (9325) Print this report
Echoes from the Abyss: Tentative evidence for P-polarization structure at the recycling cavities

[Kiwamu, Yutaro]

= Summary =
As we observed that ~10% of the reflection beam from the main interferometer is scattered into P-pol component (9314 9324), our recycling cavity can actually be a coupled cavity composed of the cavity of S-pol and one of P-pol, which are coupled by a ~10%-transmissive (imaginary) coupler. See the first figure.
In fact, we found an evidence of that, by looking at the build-up of S-pol beam and P-pol beam in the power recycling cavity

= What we did =
- lock the PRMI with the carrier on resonance.
- look at the time series of the DC laser power detected by POP_PDA1 and a temporary PD we put on the POP table (9324).
- See the following time series plot. The top trace is POP_PDA1, which detects some combination of S and P but mainly S. The bottom is the temporary PD, which detects P-pol.
This shows structure of the split peaks, which is a common feature of a coupled oscillator system. This also shows sloshing of the laser power between the world of S-pol and P-pol.

= Note =
- always PRCL on REFL, we tried both of MICH on REFL and POP, but that did not change the behavior.
- POP_PDA1 recieves the back-propagating beam while the temporary PD recieves the forward propagating one.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
tomotada.akutsu - 23:40 Saturday 22 June 2019 (9327) Print this report

Build up!!!

 

...Well, let me summarize the current situation to understand these days.... so far, the problems we are facing at the central part are:

  1. The loss
  2. Unexpectedly bakauke-nized beam shapes at POP, REFL, and AS (it is so smeared at POS to judge the shapes.)
  3. P-pol contamination in the reflected beams

(1) might be related to (3), and further quantitative evaluations would be required to find a smoking gun.

(2) might not be related to (3); when you limit the beam to S-pol, some of the halo (probably in P-pol) disppear, but still the shape seems to stick to be elliptical.

yutaro.enomoto - 0:16 Monday 24 June 2019 (9333) Print this report

= More evidence for the sloshing between the real world and the abyss =

The attached plot shows the time series of POP_PDA1_DC and the P-pol build-up monitor.
This time, the P-pol monitor is inter-calibrated to "0.1 times the output of POP_PDA1_DC".
If there is no cavity for P-pol, these two traces should coincide, or at least keep a certain ratio.

Here is the result. This shows that the ratio of the power of S-pol light and P-pol light in the PRC varied in time, which is the sloshing of the coupled cavities.

Images attached to this comment
matteo.leonardi - 1:38 Monday 24 June 2019 (9335) Print this report

According to 9332 the resonant condition difference between p pol and s pol is 5nm. This number, if coming from birefringence, should have a linear dependence from the mirror temperature. If possible it may be worth checking.
Regarding the measurement of ppol content (9314), the numbers reported are not the real losses inside PRC since the reflectivity of BS is approx 50% for s but only 20% for p pol, therefore a correction needs to be applied.

tomotada.akutsu - 20:12 Monday 24 June 2019 (9343) Print this report

Well, I wondered why the beam spots of IR are so elliptic. Is it an independent issue than the polarization? I still suspect any clipping anywhere...

Search Help
×

Warning

×