Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
takaaki.yokozawa - 9:04 Saturday 25 May 2019 (8974) Print this report
XY arm finesse measurement was completed

Yokozawa

/users/yokozawa/fitting/GPStime.txt

1242775383 73K 120K
20190525_IR_X_ringdown_1.txt

1242775985 73K 120K
20190525_IR_X_ringdown_2.txt

1242776156 73K 120K
20190525_IR_X_ringdown_3.txt

1242775383 65K 74K
20190525_IR_Y_ringdown_1.txt

1242775985 65K 74K
20190525_IR_Y_ringdown_2.txt

1242776156 65K 74K
20190525_IR_Y_ringdown_3.txt

I will also try, but could someone check the Michimura-san's code with k1ctr machine environment?

/kagra/Dropbox/Personal/yuta/Commissioning/201905/ArmRingDownFit.m

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
takaaki.yokozawa - 12:45 Saturday 25 May 2019 (8975) Print this report

Fit results with

Finesse=pi*c*TauHalf/log(2)/cav.L

Images attached to this comment
tomotada.akutsu - 12:49 Saturday 25 May 2019 (8976) Print this report

By the way, this would be one of frequently-asked questions; what are the small but obvious IR spots distributed in the same angular spacing around/surrounding the center of the mirror???

yuta.michimura - 21:51 Saturday 25 May 2019 (8977) Print this report

Thank you very much Yokozawa-san for the measurement!

Attached are updated plots with my code.
- Xarm ring down fitting results since May 16
- Yarm ring down fitting results since May 16
- Yarm finesse depencence on ETMY temperature

The measured finesse this morning was:
Xarm 1451(1) with ITMX 73 K ETMX 120 K
Yarm 1312(5) with ITMY 65 K ETMY 75 K

The finesse looks a bit too high considering ITMX transmission is 0.44% and ITMY transmission is 0.48% (JGW-T1809173).
If we believe these ITMY transmission, the maximum finesse without any other losses would be 1428 for Xarm and 1310 for Yarm.
There might be some systematics on the finesse measurement.

By the way, I checked the past data and I guess todays Xarm ring down measurements are done on the GPS times
1242771657 (bad), 1242771991,1242772291
instead of
1242775383, 1242775985, 1242776156
as reported on klog #8974.

The ring down done at 1242771657 had some bump during the ring down and the fitting was not reliable.

Images attached to this comment
takaaki.yokozawa - 12:22 Sunday 26 May 2019 (8980) Print this report

> Akutsu-san,

Actually I don't know... dust??

 

> Michimura-san,

Thank you for your calculation.

tomotada.akutsu - 15:04 Monday 27 May 2019 (8984) Print this report

Well, I mean spots on the recoil mass(?)...

koji.nagano - 12:05 Tuesday 28 May 2019 (8992) Print this report

I'm not really sure but they seem to be scattering (of IR?) of some bolt heads for fixing some flange, don't they?
Since the total number of the spots may be 24 (estimated from the spot number in 90 deg of the top right part), are they from the flange ICF253?

Search Help
×

Warning

×