Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
ISC (General)
Hiroki Fujimoto - 3:53 Thursday 20 August 2026 (37384) Print this report
Comment to Improving the sub-laser alignment for the PRCL/SRCL measurements (37369)

Saito-kun reported today’s SRX/SRY length measurement yielded an unexpected result.
So I independently performed a cross-check of the SRX data analysis and obtained a result which is consistent with the previous measurement.

Fig. 1 shows the FSR index vs. beat frequency plot for today’s SRX measurement, obtained by applying the today's measurement data to the analysis code that I previously used (klog #37184).

The fitted SRX lengths are

  • L_SRX_measured (my code) = 68.2862(18) m
  • L_SRX_measured (Saito-kun's code) = 68.2261(18) m

For comparison,

  • L_SRX_measured (previous measurement: klog #37260) = 68.2842(13) m
  • L_SRX_design = 68.2562 m

The result obtained with my code is consistent with the previous measurement, and this suggests that there may be an issue with Saito-kun’s analysis code.
We would like to discuss this tomorrow.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×