Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
takahiro.yamamoto - 8:55 Wednesday 03 August 2022 (21676) Print this report
Actuator efficiency measurement with MICH

[Ushiba, YamaT]
 

Abstract

MICH was locked stably with a 3f signal, so we measured optical gain and actuator efficiency of BS TM.
Measured actuator efficiency is ~5.9e-11 * f^{-2} which seems to be consistent with ones measured in O3 (I haven't estimated an error in detail yet).
  

Details

Optical gain of MICH
Optical gain of MICH was estimated by using MICH fringes at first.
As shown in Fig.1, estimated optical gain H_mich is ~4.9e6 [ct/m] (= 0.42ct * 4 * \pi / 1064e-9m)
where H_mich means from the MICH displacement to K1:LSC-REFL_PDA2_RF51_Q_ERR_DQ.
We need to take care that optical gain which is used for reconstructing the MICH displacement is from the MICH displacement to K1:LSC-MICH_IN1_DQ.

Relation between K1:LSC-MICH_IN1_DQ and K1:LSC-REFL_PDA2_RF51_Q_ERR_DQ is
K1:LSC-MICH_IN1_DQ = K1:LSC-REFL_PDA2_RF51_Q_ERR_DQ / K1:LSC-PSL_PWR_SCALE_OUT * K1:LSC-PD_DOF_MTRX_3_18.
Now K1:LSC-PSL_PWR_SCALE_OUT and K1:LSC-PD_DOF_MTRX_3_18 is ~2.4 and 1.0, respectively.

So optical gain for CAL is ~2.0e6 [ct/m] (=4.9e6 / 2.4 * 1.0).

Actuator efficiency of BS TM
Next, we measured some transfer functions for estimating BS actuator efficiency.
TF from K1:VIS-BS_TM_ISCINF_L_OUT to K1:LSC-MICH_IN1_DQ shows the product of MICH optical gain and the actuator response. Measured value is ~1.2e-6 [ct/ct] @10Hz (See Fig.2).
As the result, BS actuator efficiency can be estimated as
5.9e-13 [ct/m] @10Hz (=1.2e-6 [ct/ct] @10Hz / 4.9e6 [ct/m] * 2.4).

In the observation band (above 10Hz), we can approximate as
5.9e-11 * f^{-2} [ct/m]


By the way, norm factor for PD signal seems to be multiplied to PD signal on the MEDM screen as shown in Fig.3.
However, it is actually divided on the real-time model.
Thanks to this confusing MEDM screen, I computed BS actuator efficiency as 1.0e-13 [ct/m] @10Hz (=1.2e-6@10Hz / 4.9e6 / 2.4) at first and spent wasted a few hours to check gain, filter modules etc. of all blocks on the MICH control loop.
 
 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
takahiro.yamamoto - 8:52 Thursday 04 August 2022 (21681) Print this report

Abstract

I also measured the actuator efficiency of ITMX TM and ITMY TM.
Absolute value of actuator efficiency of ITMX is consistent with one in O3GK.
For ITMY is ~30% different. (It seems to be too large...?)
I still miss something in the sign of actuator efficiency.

 

Details

In addition to measure the TF form BS to MICH error (See also klog#21676), TFs from ITMX and ITMY to MICH error were also measured.
Fig.1-3 show TFs from each suspension as
A_$(optic) * C_mich / (1 + G_mich)
where A_$(optic) is actuator response from SUMOUT_OUT to displacement, C_mich is MICH optical gain, and G_mich is open loop transfer function of MICH.

By dividing TFs each other, actuator ratio of each suspension can be obtained.
(Then I assume that pendulum response can be approximated as f^{-2} above resonant frequency).

As the results, efficiency ratio, ITMX/BS and ITMY/BS are 0.023 and 0.020, respectively.
Because EUL2COIL matrix was changed after O3GK, we need to correct as factor of 4 to compared with the past measurements.
(current matrix values are 0.25 for L to each coil and values in O3GK were 1.0.)
According to klog#14265, past values are 0.09186 (IX) and 0.1037 (IY)

By multiplying factor of 4, ITMX actuator efficiency is consistent between my measurement (0.092 = 0.023*4) and past measurement.
About ITMY, there is 30% difference between my measurement (0.08 = 0.020*4) and past measurement.

By the way, there is one more mystery about the sign of actuator efficiency.
Phase behavior of TF from ITMX and from ITMY are same. But it should be opposite because plus L direction of ITMX and of ITMY are plus MICH and minus MICH direction, respectively.
We need to check it more carefully.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×