Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
VIS (General)
takafumi.ushiba - 12:27 Friday 20 February 2026 (36408) Print this report
Transfer function measurement from Type-A hierarchical actuators to TM OpLevs

To investigate the phase delay issues in DSOFT, I came back to check the each suspension hierarchical actuators.
What I did is the following three measurements:

1. Both MN_LOCK_Y and TM_LOCK_Y filter bank inputs are ON and FM9 of MN_LOCK_Y is ON (Same filter setting as those at OBSERVATION state).
2. Both MN_LOCK_Y and TM_LOCK_Y filter bank inputs are ON but FM9 of MN_LOCK_Y is OFF.
3. MN_LOCK_Y filter bank inputs are OFF.
Note that excitation signals were injected from K1:ASC-DHARD_Y_SM_EXC, and INPUT switches of MN_OLDAMP_{P,Y} filter banks were OFF for all measurements.

According to the MN2TM and TM2TM transger function measurement conducted on 9 February (fig1), 2 and 3 should be almost same because MN2TM transfer function was well below.
Figure 2 shows examples of TFs (ETMX and ITMX).
The setting of each transfer function measurement can be seen in the legend of the graph.

As expected,the measurement setting 2 and 3 did not change TFs so much though small (but significant) notch can be seen around 1 Hz, especially for ITMX somehow.
According to theTF measuremnt results, significant notch stracture appears when MN integrator was turned on.
This implies that cross-over frequency between MN and TM hierarchical actuators are not optimal, which was designed around 0.1 Hz.
Due to this issue, phase of ITMX hierarchical actuators are rotated by 360 degs around 0.5 Hz, which would be problematic for ASC controls.
So, it would be necessary to tune the hierarchical actuators, especialy cross-over frequency between MN and TM stages.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
kenta.tanaka - 21:56 Tuesday 24 February 2026 (36433) Print this report

We checked the cause of dip at 0.7 Hz in the {IX, IY} MN+TM actuator frequency response. First, we measured the TFs in the same three settings in the orignal post. Unfortunately, we could not reproduce the results, that is, the large dip around 0.7 Hz could not be observed in any settings (Fig.1).

I'm not sure of the reason why.

Note: This time, we found that TM actuators was saturated during the measurement in this measurement setting. So we adjusted the excitation setting not to saturate TM actuators during the measurement. This point is difference from the previous measurement. Thanks to this, the coherence above 0.3 Hz seems to be improved (fig.2).

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×