Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
LAS (bKAGRA laser)
osamu.miyakawa - 19:02 Tuesday 21 October 2025 (35386) Print this report
Preaparation for swapping master laser for neoLASE

(Uchiyama, Miyakawa, remote: Tanaka)

First, we swapped the fiber laser setting to the neoLASE setting this morning. A mirror on the X-axis stage to merge the light was shifted to select the neoLASE path. We aligned to PMC and locked PMC and IMC to the neoLASE laser with 20W input. Tests I show below will be the final test of the current master laser of neoLASE.

  1. First, we measured the frequency noise of neoLASE. What we measured on 10/8 seemed to be with ~9kHz PMC UGF. Fig. 1 shows the comparison between today and 10/8. It looks that today's data shows lower frequency noise above 1kHz. It was measured with 4kHz PMC UGF (Fig.2). 10dB gain between IN1 and IN2 in the  PMC circuit exists, so the gain at -10dB shows the correct UGF. I guess we forgot the 10dB gain on the 10/8's measurement. When I added another 10dB gain on the servo, which made 9kHz UGF correspond to the 10/8's noise. Anyway, they correspond below 1kHz and are still 3 times noisier than the FB laser.
  2. We looked at the effect of the scattering light by shaking a sensor card around the amplifier, especially around the bright location looked at by the sensor card. However, we did not see any frequency noise enhancement on both PMC and IMC error signals.
  3. When we looked at the spectrum of intensity noise of neoLASE, we saw moving peaks in the intensity noise as we had seen at Toyama Univ (Fig. 2). However, it was difficult to see the coherence between the position of peaks and the frequency noise.

We left the trials above because they can be seen after swapping the master laser. And, we started preparing for swapping the master laser of neoLASE. I put two bars to keep the position of the board below the laser head (Fig. 3), and set a camera to keep the beam position for swapping (Fig. 4).

We are ready to swap the master laser, but we did not have enough time to finish it today. So we leave ~20W neoLASE on and keep PMC and IMC locked over the night to see the final stability of the current master laser.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
shinji.miyoki - 23:07 Tuesday 21 October 2025 (35387) Print this report

At present, the EOM path in the IMC loop (common mode servo) uses two HV amps, F30PV and F10A. F30PV has a 10 times gain and 35V max out, while F10A 10V max in, 10 times gain and 100V mazxout. And the signal path is 1) common mode servo out -> F30PV input -> F30PV output -> F10A input -> F10A output -> EOM.

If the output of the common mode servo for the EOM path is over 1V during IMC control, the output of F30PV will be over 10V, which is over the max input for F30PV. 

So, It is better to check the output of the common mode servo or F30PV by using T, whether it is over 1 or 10V in the case of neoLase, because neoLase has larger frequency noise around the frequencies that EOM should manage.

It is better to check whether the F10A is healthy or not. (If F10A just cuts the over 10V by using a diode or something, F10A can be healthy, I guess.)

On the other hand, PA-85 can accept 35V input. (Of course, the output will be cut at ~ 200V which was limited by the operation voltage for PA-85)

osamu.miyakawa - 9:16 Wednesday 22 October 2025 (35390) Print this report

I forgot to upload a picture of moving intensity noise.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×