Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
satoshi.tanioka - 17:49 Saturday 16 March 2019 (8427) Print this report
Prometheus PZT efficiency measurement & PLL locking

Matteo, Ryousuke, Satoshi

This entry is a log on Mar. 15th.

We measured the the efficiency of old Prometheus' PZT by monitoring the bandwidth of beatnote with sinusodial wave injection.
This Prometheus is currently used for ALS Y.

After lunch break, Ryousuke did PLL lock, and measured TF of the loop.

I hope  the results will be reported by Ryousuke.

Comments to this report:
ryousuke.sugimoto - 17:40 Sunday 17 March 2019 (8434) Print this report

Sorry for late report.

 

First attached figure is the result of the measurement of old Y Prometheus PZT efficiency conduct in the same procedure as 8378 (This measurement was conducted without PLL lock).

The injection wave voltage is 1 Vp-p.

The vertical axis is normalized by the nominal value of the PZT efficiency (1.4MHz/V).

We plan to insert a notch filter in line with resonance.

 

We also achieved PLL locking of the old Prometheus laser to the PSL main laser.

Second figure is the OLTF of the measured PLL loop.

UGF is about 20 kHz, the phase margin is about 40 degrees.

 

When OLG is sufficiently larger than 1, the free-run noise of Prometheus can be estimated by multiplying the control signal from the servo filter by the PZT efficiency.

The third figure is the free-run noise of old Y Prometheus obtained from the measured control signal.

Images attached to this comment
ryousuke.sugimoto - 5:32 Monday 25 March 2019 (8496) Print this report
I compared the OLTF of PLLY measured on 2/15 with the calculat model.
The transfer function model takes into account the the servo filter, PFD, actuator efficiency, and the resonance of the laser PZT and time delay.
 
The resonance frequency of PZT was set to 300 kHz, and the Q factor was set to 20.
The time delay term is exp (-i * f * 10 ^ -5).
Also, although the second and third boost filters are 20 Hz / 2 kHz, they are set to 20 Hz / 1.6 KHz for to match the measured values.
I compared the OLTF of PLLY measured on 2/15 with the calculat model.
The transfer function model takes into account the the servo filter, PFD, actuator efficiency, and the resonance of the laser PZT and time delay.
 
The resonance frequency of PZT was set to 300 kHz, and the Q factor was set to 20.
The time delay term is exp (-i * f * 10 ^ -5).
Also, although the second and third boost filters are 20 Hz / 2 kHz, they are set to 20 Hz / 1.6 KHz for to match the measured values.
I compared the OLTF of PLLY measured on 2/15 with the calculat model.
The transfer function model takes into account the the servo filter, PFD, actuator efficiency, and the resonance of the laser PZT and time delay.
The resonance frequency of PZT assumed to 300 kHz, and the Q factor set to 20.
The time delay term set to exp (-i * f * 10 ^ -5).
Also, although the second and third boost filters are 20 Hz / 2 kHz, they are set to 20 Hz / 1.6 KHz for to match the measured values.
The transfer function model takes into account the the servo filter, PFD, actuator efficiency, and the resonance of the laser PZT and time delay.
 
The resonance frequency of PZT assumed to 300 kHz, and the Q factor was set to 20.
The time delay term is exp (-i * f * 10 ^ -5).
Also, although the second and third boost filters are 20 Hz / 2 kHz, they are set to 20 Hz / 1.6 KHz for to match the measured values.
Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×