Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
VIS (EY)
lucia.trozzo - 17:46 Wednesday 06 March 2019 (8327) Print this report
ETMY: IP Inertial sensors calibration and sensing matrix

= Geophones calibration=

Assuming that the IP LVDT driving and sensing calibration is correct I used it to intercalibrate the IP geophones.

We follow the same procedure used for the accelerometers on ETMX IP ( see entry 7341 ).

I injected noise in Yaw and measured the ratio between LVDT yaw and each geophone response (converted in diplacement):  (Yaw_LVDT*r)/(GEO)/(w)

Such function (shown on pic1 and pic2) should be flat in the region from 200 mHz to ~2 Hz (where the coherence is 1).

The extrapolated calibration factors are:

cal G1 at 0.5 Hz 1.7578
cal G2 at 0.5 Hz 1.45
cal G3 at 0.5 Hz 0.94

As expected, after implementing the calibration the fuction is one in the flat region (pic 3).

=Geophones sensing matrix=

Then I have computed the diagoanlized sensing matrix  by injecting a line at 2 Hz for each d.o.f and measuring the amplitude and phase of the TF between each GEO (converted in displacement) and the diagonalized LVDT sensor.

TF_ji = (GEO_j/(2pi*f0))/LVDT_i        j = 1, 2, 3    i = L, T, Y        f0 = 2 Hz.

This values are reported in a matrix where the columns correspond to  L, T and Y and the lines to the three geophones.

The sensing matrix, is computed as the inverse of such matrix, and it is reported below:

H1 H2 H3  
0.6022 -0.1876 -0.3948 GEO_L
0.0957 -0.6754 0.6508 GEO_T
0.5605 0.6721 0.6846 GEO_Y
 

Now the calibration factors and Geo sensing matrix are implemented in the MEDM screen.

As a final check I have to measure the TF injeecting noise from the diagonalized virtual acutators and looking at the diagonalized LVDT and geophones and verify that: TF_LVDT = TF_GEO/w.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
lucia.trozzo - 17:23 Friday 08 March 2019 (8353) Print this report

Today I measured the IP TF injeecting noise from the diagonalized virtual acutators and looking at the diagonalized LVDT and geophones.

First of all I  verified  that the shape of TF_LVDT  are not changed from that that measured last friday (see Klog 8270): in  Pic1,Pic2 Pic3 we can see (first two panel on left: blue curves refers to old ones while  red curves the measurements performed Today ) that they aren' changed. The IP, and even the pendulous masses, after the pumping down, look not rubbing or touching.

In this plots we can see also the IP TFs measured with the geofhones (on the right).

As Final check I  verified TF_LVDT = TF_GEO/w  (See Pic 4,).

 The phase lag between geophones and LVDTs is pi/2 as expected. 

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×