With help of Yokozawa-san,
= PRM =
-- IM-tilt check was done; after the one-flag removal, the PRM mirror became tilted in positive PIT and the oplev spot was off from the QPD (fig1). The IM tilt was compensated by the picomotor so that the oplev spot came at the good position which was recorded in ALL_OPLEVS.adl, i.e, PIT~ 150 urad, YAW~ -10urad.
-- After this tilt tuning, it was found that the IM-OSEM-(V1)/V2/V3 signals became saturated. also the OSEM-H1 flag became at close position at its OSEM-body. The options to avoid this situation would be to set the BF-GAS position lower, or to do OSEM-body / plate adjustment.
-- It also looked all the masses were freely suspended (visually).
-- This is going to be checked more concretely by transfer function measurement.
-- After this check, a large offsets like -8000 to K1:VIS-PRM_IM_OPTICALIGN_Y_OFFSET, was injected with ramp time of 60 ~ 120 sec, for a check. Then found that:
-- If the ramp time was like 60 sec for ~7000 to optic_align, no resonance was excited. (I did not try this many times just I have tried 120s and 60s here)
-- even if a large offsets like -8000 was injected, TM was freely suspended, I could not find any touching / hitting part around TM-stage. It was true that some of the horizontal IM-flags looked close to the body though.
-- Somehow I could not center the beam spot on the PSD. (At first I found I was pushing IM to opposite yaw-direction, but even when I pushed IM to apropriate direction, it did not seemed to be centered. ) This wil be checked with experts on next monday.
-- remaining work for PRM:
-- PRM: check the large offset to IM is acceptable and investigate good (better) ramp time for this / measure TM-satge transfer functions with new actuation matrix / release bread board
-- IM-flag position in the misalignment condition is to be checked again.
-- (Do OSEM position alinment again?)
-- photos: https://photos.app.goo.gl/FUKNN37rHJUNWMg56