Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
ISC (General)
takaaki.yokozawa - 11:24 Sunday 09 August 2026 (37333) Print this report
Measurement of transfer function ETMX TM,IM, MN to ALS DARM
With the same manner of klog36150, we measured the transfer function for the ALS DARM lock.
The situation was not changed from Jan. 2026, we may not need to tune the gain.

https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=36150
Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
kenta.tanaka - 11:59 Sunday 09 August 2026 (37335) Print this report

thank you for measuring. i have one question. do you compensate the DARM cavity pole for RSE in this measurements? because RSE cavity pole should be changed from PRFPMI one. 

takaaki.yokozawa - 15:46 Sunday 09 August 2026 (37337) Print this report
Thank you for your comment. The measurement this morning is to confirm the actuator efficiencies (ETMX TM, IM, MN) were not change.
I locked the ALS CARM and measured the transfer function, so I didn't try ALS DARM lock yet.
kenta.tanaka - 3:27 Monday 10 August 2026 (37339) Print this report

Sorry. I'm talking about not ALS_DARM "lock" but the ALS_DARM "sensor". You measured the TFs from EX actuators to ALS_DARM sensor, K1:LSC-ALS_DARM_OUT. This ALS_DARM sensor has a pseudo CP filter to mimic an IR DARM responce. For example,  in the PRFPMI case, There is the CP filter, which is labeled as "CP_PRFPMI", in FM2 of this filter bank. In other words, for RSE, you need a filter corresponding to the ALS_DARM_OUT filter bank that is matched to the RSE CP because RSE CP differs from PRFPMI CP. My question is: Have you performed that operation?

But, even if that operation wasn't performed, it's very good to know that the actuators themselves have not changed since PRFPMI.

Search Help
×

Warning

×