Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (ITF Control)
satoru.takano - 23:35 Sunday 31 May 2026 (36978) Print this report
SRMI was locked stably at f1 resonance in SRC

[Fujimoto, Takano]

Summary

We noticed that the previous locking point of SRMI was not as intended, somewhere very weird. Finally, we found the good locking point, where MICH is at the dark fringe and the f1 sidebands are on resonance in the SRC.

Detail

Once we thought that we could lock SRMI (see here), but after further discussion, we concluded that this locking point was not as expected, because the AS34 buildup was -0.04, whereas we observed it can reach ~ 0.9. After several trials and errors, we found out the optimal conditions for locking it at the point we wanted: MICH is at the dark fringe and the f1 sidebands are on resonance in SRC (Fig. 3). We implemented the appropriate servo settings in the VERTEX guardian. We could lock SRMI by requesting it. The measured open loop transfer functions are as attached (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).

During the trial, we noticed that PR3 often moved quite largely, sometimes more than 10 urad. It looked like big glitches pushed it. These glitches sometimes unlocked the interferometers during the initial alignment (Fig. 4).

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
satoru.takano - 2:07 Monday 01 June 2026 (36979) Print this report

SRMI was also locked with 3f signals (REFL 51I for SRCL, REFL 51Q for MICH) under the same conditions. It should be noted that the demodulation phase of REFL51 was optimised not for sensing SRCL & MICH signals, but for avoiding glitches when IR flashes at REFL table. This may cause weird phase rotation of the measured open loop transfer functions, as attached (Fig. 1 for MICH, Fig. 2 for SRCL). For stable locking of SRMI and DRMI, the phasing work seems necessary.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×