Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
takafumi.ushiba - 17:45 Tuesday 10 June 2025 (34137) Print this report
Sensitivity difference when OMC ADS was performed with the upper/lower sideband

Abstract:

I checked the max value of K1:DAS-RANGE_BNS when OMC ADS was performed with upper/lower sidebad.
Though I don't check if the statistic is enough or not, the sensitivity seems high when OMC alignment was performed with upper sideband.

Detail:

Current LSC_LOCK guardian performs the OMC alignment with RF sideband evey time when lockloss happens, so the alignment to OMC can basically keep the good condition.
However, current guardian doesn't check if the RF sideband is upper one or lower one, and we have known that somehow upper sideband and lower sideband has a difference in power.
Therefore, I checked the difference in terms of the sensitivity when OMC ADS was performed with the upper/lower sideband.
I checked max value of K1:DAS-RANGE_BNS in each lock when LSC_LOCK guardian was at the OBSERVATION state after 0:00 JST of June 6, 2025.
Followings are the summary of how many times the max value of K1:DAS-RANGE_BNS reached to certain values when OMC ADS was performed with upper/lower sideband.

K1:DAS-RANGE_BNS max All Upper Lower
5.3 1 0 1
5.4 0 0 0
5.5 1 0 1
5.6 2 0 2
5.7 1 1 0
5.8 5 4 1
5.9 7 1 6
6 6 3 3
6.1 2 1 1
6.2 6 5 1
6.3 8 8 0
6.4 6 6 0
6.5 3 3 0
6.6 2 2 0

According to the table, high sensitivity seems to achieve when OMC ADS was performed with upper sidebands.
So, it might be good to modify the guardians to select the upper sideband for OMC ADS during the lock acquisition.

Note:

I used the data when SR2 oscilated, so it might be better to check the similar thing again by only using the data after SR2 was recovered.

Comments to this report:
takafumi.ushiba - 15:01 Wednesday 11 June 2025 (34159) Print this report

To compare the difference when OMMC ADS was performed with upper sideband and lower sideband, I checked the OMMT2 and OSTM output values when OMC ADS was performed with upper sideband and lower sideband (fig1).
Left T cursor shows the time when OMC ADS was finished with lower sideband (OMC trans power was about 9.5mW).
Right T cursor shows the time when OMC ADS was finished with upper sideband (OMC trans power was about 10.5mW).

Though the ADS was performed with lower sideband several minutes ago, good value recorded after ADS with upper sideband was different.
Note that the alignment to lower sideband seemed good after ADS with lower sideband even if OMC was relocked because we could observe almost same transmission power when OMC was relocked with lower sideband (around t = -2h2m).
So, even if the values was converged by ADS with lower sideband, the alignment to upper sideband seems not good somehow.

According to the original post, the sensitivity seems to be better when OMC ADS was performed with upper sideband.
This implies that the final alignment varies with the sideband that used for OMC ADS, and the carrier light seems to prefer the good alignment for upper sideband.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×