Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
hirotaka.yuzurihara - 16:20 Friday 28 March 2025 (33153) Print this report
lockloss investigation: 2025/03/18~3/20

I performed the lockloss investigation for the recent lockloss from the OBSERVATION state of the LSC_LOCK guardian, between 2025/03/18 04:43:0 UTC and 3/19 15:40:20 UTC. The previous lockloss investigation was posted in klog33036.
During this period, there were 47 lockloss. The plots are summarized in wiki.

1Hz seismic motion made the IMC lockloss

For 8 lockloss, we saw the excess of the seismic motion with 1~10 Hz, which made the oscillation of the IMC length control and made the IMC lockloss.

Oscillation of MICH and PRCL with 1.65 Hz

For 1 lockloss (2025-03-20 01:27:34.437500 UTC), there was an oscillation in the MICH and PRCL error signals with 1.65 Hz (Fig). I didn't find the coincident oscillation in the oplev signals. 

Oscillation of ITMY and ETMY with 0.9 Hz (or 0.88Hz?)

For 3 lockloss, there was an oscillation in the ASC signal (especially CSOFT) with 0.9 Hz (Fig). For one lockloss, there are coincident oscillations in the PRM pitch, PR2 pitch, and ITMX pitch with 0.88 Hz (Fig).

  • 2025-03-20 05:56:20.812500 UTC
  • 2025-03-20 06:14:23.062500 UTC
  • 2025-03-20 09:07:25.562500 UTC

Oscillation of OMC PD over minutes

The amplitie of OMC PD looks growing over several minutes (Fig).

Others

Sometimes, we saw the saturation of OMC DCPD signals just before the lockloss. Sometimes, there was no saturation. In addition, the time it takes to saturate depends on the case.  The cause of the OMC saturation is still unclear.
Based on Ushiba-san's suggestion, I will try to characterize whether the OMC alignment is good or bad before the lock loss by using the other PD channel at OMMT.

Memo

Even though the lockloss occurred in the end, there was a recovery from the OMC oscillation twice.

  • 2025-03-20 00:06:20.812500 UTC (Fig)
  • 2025-03-20 14:45:35.562500 UTC (Fig)
Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
hirotaka.yuzurihara - 7:46 Thursday 03 April 2025 (33200) Print this report

By adding the OMMT2 TRANS and ASC channels, I investigated the lockloss cause. I didn't find the clear relationship for the lockloss cause yet. I summarize the current findings and classification by OMMT2 TRANS behaviors.
I also checked the typical values of channels during the stable operation (~7hour) at 3/18 and tried to compare these value and values just before the lockloss.
 

Typical value during stable operation at 3/18

Figures 1~4 show the typical value during the stable operation. I collected the typical values as follow:

  • OMC DCPD: 1000~3000 (somtimes 0~4000)
  • OMMT2 TRANS: ~100 (sometimes reach 200)
  • AS17_Q: 0.01~0.02
  • POP90_I: ~17.5 (sometimes drop to 16.5 with characteristic frequency)
  • IRX TRANS: ~142.5 (fluctuate between 140~144)
  • DHARD: -0.02~0.02
  • CHARD: -0.05~0.05

I tried to clasify the lockloss by checking the OMMT2 TRANS (and OMC DCPD) behavior just before the lockloss.

oscillation in OMC DCPD

Figure 5 shows the example. Other plots can be seen in wiki.

oscillation in OMMT2 TRANS

Figure 6 shows the example. Other plots can be seen in wiki. As Kenta-san pointed out previously, the oscillation in OMMT2 TRANS looks like coincident with DARM Y.

increase OMMT2 TRANS

Figure 7 shows the example. Other plots can be seen in wiki. This case happened frequently.

When the OMMT2 TRANS value increases, the IRX(Y) TRANS reduces. It's natural because the laser power is comming to AS port instead of the arm cavity. At that time, the DARM Y is increasing to reach 0.02

bias on OMMT2 TRANS

Figure 7 shows the example. Other plots can be seen in wiki. The OMMT2 TRANS value looks like biased 3 seconds before the lockloss.

increase DHARD or CHARD error signals

Other plots can be seen in wiki and wiki. This case also happened frequently, with the coincident with the increase of OMMT2 TRANS.

 

double peaks in distribution of OMC DCPD

Figures 1, 2, 7 show the example. Other plots can be seen in wiki. The distribution of OMC DCPD looks like double peak, not the Gauss distiburion or the single peak, even though the data didn't clear transient noise.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×