Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
hirotaka.yuzurihara - 16:46 Thursday 05 September 2024 (30997) Print this report
lockloss investigation: 2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST

[Kenta, Yuzu]
We performed the lockloss investigation of 2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST. We checked the timeseries and found the feedback signal for the DARM is larger than the usual. Just before the lockloss, the feedback signal was -46e+6. As a result, K1:VIS-ETMX_MN_COILOUTF_H1_OUTPUT was saturated (>-32000) (Fig1). We checked the trend of K1:LSC-DARM_OUT_DQ. During the continuous lock more than 3 hours, the DARM feedback signal seems to be drifted (Fig2). We're not sure the cause of the drift.(temperature?)

memo

  • We checked the timeseries of several signals.
    • ndscope -t '2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST' -w (-3, +0.6) /users/Commissioning/templates/ndscope/PRFPMI_ERR_FBK.yml
    • ndscope -t '2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST' -w (-3, +0.6) /users/Commissioning/templates/ndscope/Xarm.yml
    • ndscope -t '2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST' -w (-3, +0.6) /users/Commissioning/templates/ndscope/Yarm.yml
    • ndscope -t '2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST' -w (-3, +0.6) /users/Commissioning/templates/ndscope/DARM_LOCK.yml
    • ndscope -t '2024/09/05 14:50:00 JST' -w (-3, +0.6) /users/Commissioning/templates/ndscope/DARM_LOCK_coils.yml
  • Screenshot of LSC_LOCK guardian (Fig3)
Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
hirotaka.yuzurihara - 8:59 Friday 06 September 2024 (31010) Print this report

I checked the trend of the DARM feedback signal and the temperature monitors.(Fig1) The temperature monitors in the center area shows the similar drift with the DARM feedback. On the other hands, the temperatures in the EX and EY area didn't show the drift.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×