Thank you for checking WFS-HWP, Ikeda-san.
Since it was confirmed that WFS-HWP was turned, WFS-HWP was turned so that the input power of the WFS is the same power.
Details
Unlike in klog28114, it was 0.65W in front of WFSHWP, so we made the power in front of shatter into 1.71(0.65W/0.75W*2) times in this time.
we made the WFS1 and WFS2 input power into 0.87(0.65W/0.75W) times from the power in front of WFSHWP.
| Position | klog28114 | Calculated from klog28114. | This time after HWP turning | note | |
| ① | Before WFSHWP | 0.750W | 0.65W | ||
| ② | In front of shatter | 58.3mW | 98mW (klog28114*1.71) | 0.097W | =③+④ |
| ③ | BS3 trans | 53.0mW | =⑤+⑥ | ||
| ④ | BS3 refl | 50.2mW | =⑦+⑧ | ||
| ⑤ | PZT1 refl | 22.2mW | 19.24mW (klog28114*0.87) | 19.3mW | =WFS1 input power |
| ⑥ | PZT1 refl | 36.3mW | 31.46mW (klog28114*0.87) | 32.5mW | =WFS2 |
| ⑦ | PZT3 refl | 24.6mW | =WFS3 | ||
| ⑧ | PZT3 trans | 25.8mW | =WFS4 |