Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
IOO (General)
tomotada.akutsu - 20:46 Monday 28 March 2022 (20259) Print this report
Recovery trial of the input beam axis

Yano, Akutsu (remotely Ushiba) Follow up of 20218 and 20224. Continued to 20265.

Abstract

Inspected what had happened in the IFI chamber. We confirmed the STM1 and 2 structures were rigid. We finally tweaked yaw picomotor of STM2 mirrror holder handly so that the beam spot on the IMMT1T QPD got roughly centered. Anyway, I am not sure why this indcident had happened.

Details

We started with inspecting carefully the structural rigidity of the STM1 and STM2 mirror holders and pillars; they were rigid enough. We also inspected the beam clipping on the IMMT1T table. FInally I tweaked carefully STM2 in the yaw direction and Yano-san looked at the beam spot move on the IMMT1T table. Then, I further tweaked the STM2 yaw with monitoring the IMMT1T QPD. After these, we checked the beam spot on IMMT2, PR2, and PR3. On PR2, the IR beam spot is ~ 1cm lower than the center of the target (Fig. 1), and the similar situation was observed on the PR3 target. Anyway the beam passed the PR2 mid-size baffle aperture, so we stopped our work in the morning. The follow up of this story will be done in the afternoon by Matteo and colleagues.

Notes

  • By the way, the IFI-CWP1-STM (Miyakawa-san installed in 20218 ) was, to compensate the pitching of the reflected beam from CWP1, set with some folded aluminum foils underneath the mirror holder. This part should be revisited later, maybe (Figs. 2 and 3).
  • The ground near the IFI chamber was wet due to spring water..., which was just "stopped" with a dirty paper. Need to be replaced with proper ones... (Fig. 4)
Images attached to this report
Search Help
×

Warning

×