Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
MIF (General)
masayuki.nakano - 18:31 Wednesday 17 June 2020 (14560) Print this report
Schnupp asymmetry mesurement
With advice from Kiwamuyes

Kiwamu suggested to us the new measurement procedure for Schnupp asymmetry. The Schnupp asymmetry was measured as 3.3 m (preliminary). This result is consistent with the designed value.
We are not sure why the previous measurement has the wrong result so far, but we might need to find the reason.

Measurement principle

The detail is written in the attached Jupyter notebook. Briefly saying, compare the time of flight of photon from the EOM to the PD when each arm cavity is locked. We can derive the Schnupp asymmetry L_d from the optimal demodulation phase theta_d corresponding the flight time difference as
L_d = theta_d/(2 omega_m) c,
where omega_m is the modulation frequency.

Measurement procedure

The arm cavity loop is fully analog, and the I-MON port of the I/Q demodulator of REFL45 is used as the error signal. Therefore, the digital I/Q rotator of REFL45 is just a monitor channel, and we can rotate as we want without any effect on the loop.
I used the digital lock-in amp. The oscillator was connected to the MCE to excite the laser frequency, and REFL45I was the signal for lock-in. I rotate the demodulation phase by 360 degrees and measure the lock-in output at each demodulation phase. The result is shown in the attached figure, and the optimal phase was derived by sine fitting of this measurement data.
This procedure was written down in the script /users/Commissioning/scripts/demodphase_optimization.py

Result

The optimal phases for Xarm and Yarm were 122 and 121, respectively. Here, note that we have a Indeterminacy of 360 degrees. 
If we assume 360 degrees of additional rotation, the derived Schnupp asymmetry is 3.34 m as shown in the attached Jupyter notebook. This result is consistent with the designed value of 3.33 m.
http://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/uploads/14560_20200617115840_20200617xarm.png
                                        Xarm                                                                                                          Yarm
 

To do

The error estimation has not been done yet. I'm wondering how to determine the error.
Also, I used 45 MHz as the modulation frequency, but it is not really correct. I need to check the actual number in the mine tomorrow.
 

By the way

I think this procedure is adapted to the other signal to optimize the demodulation phase. We can fully automate the optimization process, so let's start-up this project.
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments to this report:
takashi.uchiyama - 20:44 Wednesday 17 June 2020 (14561) Print this report


the derived Schnupp asymmetry is 3.34 m as shown in the attached Jupyter notebook. This result is consistent with the designed value of 3.33 m.

Oh great!!
Thank you very much.
masayuki.nakano - 18:08 Friday 19 June 2020 (14575) Print this report

I did same measurement with REFL51, REFL135, POP17, POP45, AS17. The calculated asymmetry was 3.36(1) m.
Actually, I had one mistake in privious post.

L_d = -theta_d/(2 omega_m) c,

is correct with my difinition.

Measurement detail

  1. Lock the arm cavity as usual with REFL45
  2. Find optimal demod phase by using the script used in privious measurement.
  3. Calculate L_d by obtained theta_d

The jupyter notebook and the measured data was uploaded here.

Non-image files attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×