- Modulation frequency did not change anything drastically. Even I changed the seed frequency by 300 Hz, the error signals of MICH and SRCL are contaminated by the arm cavity resonance.
- Modulation frequency did not change anything drastically. Even I changed the seed frequency by 300 Hz, the error signals of MICH and SRCL are contaminated by the arm cavity resonance.
By the way, how did you conclude that the structure around 400 Hz comes from the arm cavity resonance?
What does the trace labeled as 'OFF resonance' show? This trace also shows similar structure.
If this trace is SRC signal when the arm cavity is kept off-resonance, it means that similar structure still exists even the resonance of the arm cavity is far way. Is this correct?
Can it come from frequency noise coupling?
The story can be the following:
- frequency noise is enhanced around 400 Hz possibly due to small phase or gain mergin there
- since SRCL is ~20 times susceptible to frequency noise, only SRC signal shows this structure. (SRC length is ~ 66m, Schnupp asymmetry of MICH is ~3.3m).