Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
CAL (XPcal)
dan.chen - 17:49 Tuesday 09 April 2024 (29150) Print this report
Alignment change because of the pumping?

After the start of pumping EXC area klog29143, it looks the Pcal-X beams moved...

We need to adjust them later.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
dan.chen - 6:35 Wednesday 10 April 2024 (29162) Print this report

I adjusted the beam positions with the picos in EXA chamber = "PCAL_EX2"
The current pressure in EXA is about 70Pa.

The displacement moved by the vacuum pumping this time was roughly the same as the last time: klog19315

We need a fine adjustment when we can request ALIGNED state to the ETMX suspension.

Images attached to this comment
dan.chen - 17:01 Thursday 25 April 2024 (29331) Print this report

With Hido Shingo

We performed the fine adjustment for the Pcal-X alignment with the ALIGNED state of the ETMX suspension.
We used PCAL_EX1(in Tx module) and PCAL_EX2(in EXA chamber) picomotors to adjust the path 1 so that the paths passed through the design position on the ETM and the center of the RxPD.
We left the Pcal-X laser ON, and the Pcal-X guardian state at OFS_CLOSED_LOW_POWER.

Attached files are showing beam positions on ETM and RxPD.

The total picomotor steps we requested are:

  • PCAL_EX1, pico 2 (path 1 yaw): -550
  • PCAL_EX2, pico 1(path 1 yaw): -600
  • PCAL_EX2, pico 2(path 1 pitch): +400
  • PCAL_EX2, pico 3(path 2 yaw): +100
  • PCAL_EX2, pico 4(path 2 pitch): +300

The final optical efficiencies were (quick measurement):

  • Path 1: 97.0%
  • Path 2: 96.5%
  • Path 1+2: 96.7%

These are similar to klog28820.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×