Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
VIS (IX)
takafumi.ushiba - 18:45 Friday 12 June 2020 (14512) Print this report
Actuator efficiency check of Type-A suspension

[Nakano, Ushiba]

We measured actuator efficiency of each stage of ITMX payload.

What we did:
Excite longitudinal motion of each stage from test point with following counts.
TM stage: 100 counts @ 10.5 Hz
IM stage: 1000 counts @ 10.5 Hz
MN stage: 100 counts @ 10.5 Hz

Then, we measured displacement signal by using calibrated DARM signal.
Results are following:
TM stage: 100 counts = 1.6e-13 m/count/rtHz @ 10.5 Hz
IM stage: 1000 counts = 8.2e-15 m/count/rtHz @ 10.5 Hz
MN stage: 100 counts = 6.1e-14 m/count/rtHz @ 10.5 Hz

So, ratios of actuator efficiency @ 10.5 Hz is as follows:
A_TM / A_IM = 19.5 @ 10.5 Hz
A_TM / A_MN = 2.6 @ 10.5 Hz

From the result above and SUMCON model, we can estimate actuator efficiency ratios @ DC.
A_TM / A_IM = 0.42 @ DC
A_TM / A_MN = 0.0024 @ DC

Since actuator efficiency of TM stage of ITMX is 5.45e-12 m/count = 8.9e-9 m/V, we can calculate as
A_IM = 2.1e-8 m/V (Design value: 2.1e-7 m/V)
A_MN = 7.7e-6 m/V (Design value: 5.1e-6 m/V) 
Designed value is referred from JGWdoc T-2011661

Note: I'm not sure details of Michimura-san's calculation. So, it might miss several factors.

Comments to this report:
ayaka.shoda - 17:41 Thursday 25 June 2020 (14621) Print this report

I adjusted the actuation efficiency of TM and MN in the suspension models.

And the attached is the transfer functions from TM/MN actuation to TM displacement in L.

It is largely different from the firue Ushiba-kun showed in the slide.

In addition, if I try to see the cross-over frequency of TM loop and MN loop, it is different from what I expected.
Below is the transfer function from the ETMX_LSC_LOCK_L_IN1 to TM displacement.
It saids that TM is not working below 10 Hz.

Is it because the actuation efficiency is so different between IX and EX?sad

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×