Summary Page – https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/
Summary for the day
-
Better Observing duty cycle compared to the previous day.
- 69,282 second in observing mode
- Duty cycle for the day: 80.18%
- Mean BNS inspiral range of about 7kpc
- Low frequency noise in the strain spectrum, is in a better state compared to December 17.
- Omicron glitch plot shows loud glitches near 3.30UTC 6.30UTC, and 11 UTC. These loud glitches lines up with prominent range instability.
- There are clusters of relatively loud glitches in the region 20.00-21.30 UTC.
-
As per the klog entry, starting from 8.30UTC, even though the detector was in the observing mode, SR3 was misaligned.
- Checking klog entry and the K1:VIS-SR3_TM_OPLEV_PIT_DIAG_DQ channel, it seems that it returned to the previous position by 11.30UTC.
- Few lockloss can be related to the earthquake happened in different regions throughout the day. Ground motion sensors recorded the same.
SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
o Lockloss near 6.30UTC lines up with the large earthquake was happened in Aomori (15.21 JST). (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219062529393-19152143.html)
o All the ground motion sensor data aligns with the lockloss near 6.30UTC (for example: https://gwdet.icrr.utokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixcseis/
o Lockloss at 12UTC aligns with variation in the ground motion (example: https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/exvseis/). Collaborator shift reported the same.
o Lockloss at 20.30UTC and corresponding drop in BNS range align with the earthquake happened in Tanegashima region (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219203213493-20052845.html). Ground motion sensor data supports the same (https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixvseis/
SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
o Lockloss near 6.30UTC lines up with the large earthquake was happened in Aomori (15.21 JST). (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219062529393-19152143.html)
o All the ground motion sensor data aligns with the lockloss near 6.30UTC (for example: https://gwdet.icrr.utokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixcseis/
o Lockloss at 12UTC aligns with variation in the ground motion (example: https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/exvseis/). Collaborator shift reported the same.
o Lockloss at 20.30UTC and corresponding drop in BNS range align with the earthquake happened in Tanegashima region (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219203213493-20052845.html). Ground motion sensor data supports the same (https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixvseis/
SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
o Lockloss near 6.30UTC lines up with the large earthquake was happened in Aomori (15.21 JST). (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219062529393-19152143.html)
o All the ground motion sensor data aligns with the lockloss near 6.30UTC (for example: https://gwdet.icrr.utokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixcseis/
o Lockloss at 12UTC aligns with variation in the ground motion (example: https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/exvseis/). Collaborator shift reported the same.
o Lockloss at 20.30UTC and corresponding drop in BNS range align with the earthquake happened in Tanegashima region (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219203213493-20052845.html). Ground motion sensor data supports the same (https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixvseis/
SEI/Ground/BLRMS_overview
-
Lockloss near 6.30UTC lines up with the large earthquake was happened in Aomori (15.21 JST).
(https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219062529393-19152143.html) -
All the ground motion sensor data aligns with the lockloss near 6.30UTC
(for example: https://gwdet.icrr.utokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixcseis/ -
Lockloss at 12UTC aligns with variation in the ground motion
(example: https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/exvseis/). Collaborator shift reported the same. -
Lockloss at 20.30UTC and corresponding drop in BNS range align with the earthquake happened in Tanegashima region (https://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20191219203213493-20052845.html).
Ground motion sensor data supports the same (https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191219/gif/ixvseis/) - (see the attched figure for an overview)
K1 HierarchicalVeto (previous day) 1260662418-1260748818 (https://gwdet.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~controls/summary/day/20191218/detchar/hveto/)
- Round 1 Winner: K1:CAL-PCAL_EX_1_PD_TX_V_DQ
- Round 2 Winner: K1:ASC-DHARD_Y_OUT_DQ
- Round 3 Winner: K1:ASC-DHARD_Y_OUT_DQ
- Round 4 Winner: K1:ASC-DHARD_Y_OUT_DQ
Relevant klog entries:
- Earthquake near Aomori: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12224
- SR3 misalignment: https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12234,https://klog.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/osl/?r=12239
FScan plots are not avialble yet. Will add the report later.
Summary for the day
• Better Observing duty cycle compared to the previous day.
o 69,282 second in observing mode
o Duty cycle for the day: 80.18%
• Mean BNS inspiral range of about 7kpc
• Low frequency noise in the strain spectrum, is in a better state compared to December 17.
• Omicron glitch plot shows loud glitches near 3.30UTC 6.30UTC, and 11 UTC. ZThese loud glitches lines up with prominent range instability.
• There are clusters of relatively loud glitches in the region 20.00-21.30 UTC.
• As per the klog entry, starting from 8.30UTC, even though the detector was in the observing mode, SR3 was misaligned.
o Checking klog entry and the K1:VIS-SR3_TM_OPLEV_PIT_DIAG_DQ channel, it seems that it returned to the previous position by 11.30UTC.
• Few lockloss can be related to the earthquake happened in different regions throughout the day. Ground motion sensors recorded the same.
Summary for the day
• Better Observing duty cycle compared to the previous day.
o 69,282 second in observing mode
o Duty cycle for the day: 80.18%
• Mean BNS inspiral range of about 7kpc
• Low frequency noise in the strain spectrum, is in a better state compared to December 17.
• Omicron glitch plot shows loud glitches near 3.30UTC 6.30UTC, and 11 UTC. ZThese loud glitches lines up with prominent range instability.
• There are clusters of relatively loud glitches in the region 20.00-21.30 UTC.
• As per the klog entry, starting from 8.30UTC, even though the detector was in the observing mode, SR3 was misaligned.
o Checking klog entry and the K1:VIS-SR3_TM_OPLEV_PIT_DIAG_DQ channel, it seems that it returned to the previous position by 11.30UTC.
• Few lockloss can be related to the earthquake happened in different regions throughout the day. Ground motion sensors recorded the same.
Summary for the day
• Better Observing duty cycle compared to the previous day.
o 69,282 second in observing mode
o Duty cycle for the day: 80.18%
• Mean BNS inspiral range of about 7kpc
• Low frequency noise in the strain spectrum, is in a better state compared to December 17.
• Omicron glitch plot shows loud glitches near 3.30UTC 6.30UTC, and 11 UTC. ZThese loud glitches lines up with prominent range instability.
• There are clusters of relatively loud glitches in the region 20.00-21.30 UTC.
• As per the klog entry, starting from 8.30UTC, even though the detector was in the observing mode, SR3 was misaligned.
o Checking klog entry and the K1:VIS-SR3_TM_OPLEV_PIT_DIAG_DQ channel, it seems that it returned to the previous position by 11.30UTC.
• Few lockloss can be related to the earthquake happened in different regions throughout the day. Ground motion sensors recorded the same.