Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
GIF (General)
kouseki.miyo - 12:08 Friday 06 September 2019 (10376) Print this report
First trial to compensate X arm length using strainmeter

Fujii, Miyo

We inject the strainmeter signal into the LVDT actuator on the IP of ETMX. We could compensate the differential ground especially 200 - 300 mHz. (Figure 3).

  • Xarm length fluctuation when the no sensor correction filters are engaged is shown in Figure2. Top is the amplitude spectrum density (ASD) of displacement of X arm. Bottom is the coherence. The strainmeter is consistent with differential motion of seismometers around 50 - 700mHz broadly. These sensors are masked by selfnoise each other. Above 700mHz, the strainmeter is masked by the noise. Below 50mHz, the seismometers are masked. On the other hand, the fulctuation of the X arm length consistents with the ground motion except the suspension response. The suspension response when the CMRR of ITMX and ETMX is good so that the coupling from common motion of the arm to differential motion of that can be ignored, is plotted in Figure2. There are big peak at 150mHz and 400mHz (Figure2). These peaks also can be seen in Figure1. These peaks are caused by the seismic motion through the LVDT sensors path because of the feedback loop using LVDTs. So, these enhancements can be reduced by the sensor correction.
  • The X arm length when the sensor correction is engaged is shown in Figure3. The motion of IP stage of ETMX is corrected using the strainmeter signal so that the ETMX moves with ITMX together. It means that the arm length is can be compensate. Anyway, the signal of strainmeter is injected on the sensor correction path of the ETMX with no specific filter, which means filter is just 1. Around 250mHz, we clealy can see the reduction of the arm motion. and also the coherence is reduced. It's so cool. However, above 700 mHz, the noise of the strainmeter enhanced the X arm length. We have to filter out above 70  mHz. Furthermore, the peaks at 150mHz and 400mHz are stil remained. We need to investigate this regidual motion. I think this is caused by ethier the CMR of suspensions or coupling from vertical motion.
  • We also could see the compensation of the tidal motion, as shown in Figure4. In this figure, the sensor correction using strainmeter is engaged when -9 minutes. After engaging the sensor correction, the drift of the X arm length is compensate. It's so cool.

Next, we have to some investigation to reduce regidual motion around 150mHz and 400mHz.
And I'm going to run the omicron when this sensor correction is engaged or not.
And I want to implement this filter long time so that some big earthquake can be hit KAGRA. I'll check the reduction when hitting the EQ. Because the strainmter have a very wide sensor range (in principle infinity) and very wide frequency band (in principle, DC), so I think X arm can ride on the earthquake wave. If it's so, It will be cool.

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
tomotada.akutsu - 12:24 Friday 06 September 2019 (10377) Print this report

So cool. This technique might be useful also for TMS, in case TMS's motion in the frequency range would become problem to the interferometr in the future (via scattered light noise upconversion???)

shinji.miyoki - 13:47 Friday 06 September 2019 (10378) Print this report
Impressive result !
yoshinori.fujii - 14:42 Friday 06 September 2019 (10381) Print this report

> Furthermore, the peaks at 150mHz and 400mHz are stil remained. We need to investigate this regidual motion. I think this is caused by ethier the CMR of suspensions or coupling from vertical motion.

  • I thought that the the residua motion of the 1st vertical mode contributed to the peak at around 150mHz , however, it seemed no. The resoannt frequencies was a bit different from 150mHz. The resonance of vertical ETMX and ITMX were at around 230 mHz. The attachement shows the spectra of the vertical motion of the each TypeA suspension during the masurement.
  • I will want to re-shape the vertical filters and that will improve the situation hopefully though, it does not seem that the the vertical motion is not the most dominant ontribution at 150mHz.
Images attached to this comment
yoshinori.fujii - 19:18 Friday 06 September 2019 (10385) Print this report

Miyo, Fujii,

A breif report on Sep. 6th 2019:
We also injected the local seismomter signal at EXV and IXV, to IP-LVDT.

  • Figure 1 shows Xarm length fluctuation in IR when the sensor correction was engaged with local seismometers at each station (c Miyo-kun). The lower pannel shows the coherence between those signals.
    • The LVDT signal of IP stage of ETMX and ITMX are corrected using the local seismometer signal. Between 0.1Hz to 0.6 Hz, the ASD of Xarm length fluctuation was reduced, as shown in the upper pannel. The coherence between the Xarm signal and differential seismometer signal was vanished at the frequency region.
    • Further analysis & consideration is to be done.
Images attached to this comment
kouseki.miyo - 9:52 Saturday 07 September 2019 (10401) Print this report

At these peaks on 150mHz and 400mHz, there are some coherecne between x arm length and common motion of the ground.
These peaks might be caused by the coupling from the common motion to the differential motion due to poor CMRR. 
In other words, I can say that the CMRR is enogh in other frequencies except such peaks.

Images attached to this comment
yoshinori.fujii - 11:32 Saturday 07 September 2019 (10402) Print this report

FYI. An interesting week looks approaching again. The ground motion on Sep. 5th is in dashed lilne, and that on Sep. 7th is in solid line.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×