Reports 1-1 of 1 Clear search Modify search
DetChar (General)
takaaki.yokozawa - 7:24 Friday 30 August 2019 (10209) Print this report
Noise inverstigation for the SRCL displacement

I investigated the noise for the SRCL displacement.

K1:CAL-CS_PROC_SRCL_DISPLACEMENT_DQ

- MICH and SRCL control noise were dominant noise below 100Hz  (Fig.1 and Fig.2)    
- 17-17.38Hz There is large coherence with SR3 pitch motion, also some coherence with SR3 Yaw motion, I didn't check this peak disappear after shutting the IR beam
- 29.75Hz 35.25-36Hz small coherence with SR3 pitch
- Some SR3/SRM DAPM signal has some coherence over 100Hz(Small for SR2)
- Also, there is som coherence in the microhone place around the BS/SR. I suspect FFU has some noise source at the higher frequency
 

Could someone investigate about the 17Hz SR3 Pitch motion?

Images attached to this report
Comments to this report:
yoshinori.fujii - 7:52 Friday 30 August 2019 (10210) Print this report

A brief check:

  • Concerning the mechanical resonances, the SR suspensions have the following modes at around the frequencies (from 5 to 50Hz), according to the model prediction (ref):
    • at 5 Hz, RM Pitch,
    • at 11 Hz, RM Vertical,
    • at 16 Hz, TM Roll
    • at 50Hz, RM Vertical.
  • About 17Hz, it could be the RM roll mode coupling.
  • about 30 to 35Hz band, it would not be due to a pure mechanical resonance since the suspension does not have resonances at the frequency band.
takaaki.yokozawa - 8:09 Friday 30 August 2019 (10212) Print this report

Thank you Fujii-san for the quick check.

Except for the 17Hz noise, they are not so narrow band and coherence itself are small.

So, not the mechanical vibration but a other light source injecting to oplev (or very small fluctuation of SRM mirror)

fabian.arellano - 11:00 Friday 30 August 2019 (10216) Print this report

In case you don't see the pictures attached to this report please click this link: 10216.

I measured the amplitude spectral densities (ASD) of the SR3 optic displacement in ALIGNED state and the coherence with the microphone in SR clean booth. See the pictures.

  • In the ASD of the motion of the optic we can see lots of features from 8.4 Hz up to 470 Hz. Likely these features are not mechanical resonances of the suspension but mechanical resonances of the oplev hardware excited by acoustic noise.
  • The coherence with the microphone also shows many peaks within that frequency range, including the vicinity of 17 Hz.

How to proceed

  1. Check the residual motion in other Type B suspensions.
  2. We can either
    • turn the clean booth fans off and check whether the peaks are gone or
    • use accelerometers on the oplev platforms and measure their coherence with oplev readout.
    • both of the above at the same time.

It's worth pointing out the following

  1. Placing accelerometers on oplev platforms is a good strategy. However, it would require a lot of care because of the Al wrap around the hardware and hard access. Likely, the oplev would require diagonalization again after the change.
  2. Measure the coherence of the SRCL signal with other optics.
  3. In case we see the same coherence with microphones in other optics a faster strategy would be to turn the filter fans off.

About the files:

Directory:

/kagra/Dropbox/Subsystems/VIS/TypeBData/SR3/Noise/Measurements/20190830/

File name

SR3_ALIGNED_ASD_20190830.xml

Images attached to this comment
takaaki.yokozawa - 3:34 Sunday 01 September 2019 (10242) Print this report

We also want to check this 35-37Hz vibration.

There is no coherence with SR microphone from your figure.

Images attached to this comment
Search Help
×

Warning

×